📦

Audit History

database-migration - 7 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v7 LatestJul 7, 2026, 07:10 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jul 7, 2026, 07:10 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v5 Jun 30, 2026, 10:39 PM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 08:01 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 08:01 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v2 Jan 4, 2026, 05:03 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 4, 2026, 05:03 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 07:10 AM

All static detections are false positives caused by Markdown code fences or JavaScript SQL template literals in migration examples. I found no prompt injection, credential access, hidden execution, network calls, or malicious intent in SKILL.md. The skill is documentation content and should be used with normal operational caution for database changes.

1
Files scanned
425
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 07:10 AM

All static detections are false positives caused by Markdown code fences or JavaScript SQL template literals in migration examples. I found no prompt injection, credential access, hidden execution, network calls, or malicious intent in SKILL.md. The skill is documentation content and should be used with normal operational caution for database changes.

1
Files scanned
425
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 10:39 PM

Static external-command, weak-crypto, and system-reconnaissance alerts were false positives from Markdown code fences and ordinary database terminology. The skill has no prompt injection or malicious intent, but it includes migration commands and destructive schema examples, so publication should carry a database safety warning.

1
Files scanned
425
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
3
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Destructive database migration examples require review
The skill includes legitimate migration examples that drop tables, remove columns, and rebuild tables from backups. These operations can cause data loss if copied into production without review, backups, and staging validation.
The referenced lines directly show destructive schema or table operations. The context is legitimate database migration guidance, so the risk is operational rather than malicious.
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False positive: Markdown code fences detected as shell execution
The static analyzer marked many triple-backtick Markdown fences as Ruby or shell backtick execution. These are documentation code blocks, not executable backtick expressions in the skill runtime.
The locations are Markdown fenced examples visible in SKILL.md. I found no Ruby source or runtime shell backtick expression in the scanned file.
Low
False positive: Weak cryptography alert has no cryptographic context
The flagged lines are the skill description, a database version-upgrade bullet, and a Markdown reference path. No hash, cipher, signing, or encryption implementation appears at these locations.
The exact lines contain database migration prose and a .md reference. There is no evidence of weak cryptographic algorithm use.
Low
False positive: System reconnaissance alert is database identifier syntax
The flagged lines use database primary-key and SQL parameter syntax, such as id fields and WHERE id clauses. They do not collect host, process, user, network, or environment information.
The lines are clearly ORM and SQL examples using record identifiers. No system reconnaissance behavior is present in the scanned content.

Risk Factors

Detected Patterns

Migration command examples execute project tooling
Audited by: codex

Jan 17, 2026, 08:01 AM

The static analyzer flagged 42 potential issues, but all are false positives. SKILL.md contains only documentation and code examples for database migration patterns. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' findings were triggered by text patterns in documentation describing migration operations. The 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' findings misidentified command-line comments as shell execution. No actual executable code, credential access, or network exfiltration patterns exist. This is static instructional content only.

2
Files scanned
603
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 08:01 AM

The static analyzer flagged 42 potential issues, but all are false positives. SKILL.md contains only documentation and code examples for database migration patterns. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' findings were triggered by text patterns in documentation describing migration operations. The 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' findings misidentified command-line comments as shell execution. No actual executable code, credential access, or network exfiltration patterns exist. This is static instructional content only.

2
Files scanned
603
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 05:03 PM

No credential access, environment harvesting, or network exfiltration patterns found. The content contains only instructional examples and documentation for database migration best practices with no executable code or data access capabilities.

4
Files scanned
639
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 05:03 PM

No credential access, environment harvesting, or network exfiltration patterns found. The content contains only instructional examples and documentation for database migration best practices with no executable code or data access capabilities.

4
Files scanned
639
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude