Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-5E93C2C6

6/30/2026, 10:36:00 PM

data-quality-frameworks security assessment v5

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
data-quality-frameworks
Version
v5
Maintainer
wshobson
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 588 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Low

1 confirmed security finding requires attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but review found they are Markdown examples, inline framework names, schema metadata, and resource links rather than executable malicious code. The skill is safe to publish with low risk because it includes user-facing shell setup commands and outbound documentation links that users may choose to follow.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 588 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 28 evidence locations

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (1)

RISK-001 Low
Reconnaissance Findings Are Data Validation Examples
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The system and network reconnaissance hits occur in dbt model references, SQL validation examples, UUID or timestamp schema fields, and accepted values examples. They do not inspect the host, enumerate networks, or collect environment details.
The lines are part of data quality sample logic rather than host or network discovery. No system commands, sockets, scanners, or filesystem enumeration are present.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (3)
Low
External Command Findings Are Documentation Examples
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The reported external command locations are Markdown code fences, inline expectation names, or example setup commands for Great Expectations and dbt. No file contains executable hooks, hidden scripts, command interpolation, or automatic shell execution.
The only scanned file is SKILL.md, and the flagged locations are documentation snippets. There is no executable script or runtime path that would run these commands automatically.
Low
Weak Cryptography Findings Are False Positives
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged lines describe data quality dimensions, table descriptions, identifiers, timestamps, and documentation text. No evidence found of cryptographic API usage, weak hash selection, encryption, decryption, or credential handling.
Manual review found data modeling and validation text at the reported locations. The scanner appears to have matched generic terms rather than real cryptographic behavior.
Low
Hardcoded URLs Are Documentation References
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The four hardcoded URLs point to public documentation for Great Expectations, dbt, data contracts, and Soda Core. They are not called by code and do not transmit user data.
The URLs appear only in the Resources section of the Markdown file. No network client code or data exfiltration path exists in the scanned file.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable