📦

Audit History

cqrs-implementation - 7 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v7 LatestJul 7, 2026, 07:00 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jul 7, 2026, 07:00 AM No confirmed findings0External commandsNetwork access
v5 Jun 30, 2026, 10:32 PM 2 confirmed0 Network accessExternal commands
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 07:55 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 07:55 AM No confirmed findings0Network accessExternal commands
v2 Jan 5, 2026, 04:57 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 5, 2026, 04:57 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 07:00 AM

All static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The evidence shows Markdown code fences, database access examples, application identifiers, and reference links, with no prompt injection or malicious intent found.

1
Files scanned
553
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 07:00 AM

All static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The evidence shows Markdown code fences, database access examples, application identifiers, and reference links, with no prompt injection or malicious intent found.

1
Files scanned
553
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 10:32 PM

Static analysis found command, network, weak crypto, and reconnaissance patterns, but review shows they are documentation false positives. The skill contains a Markdown guide with Python CQRS examples, SQL snippets, and reference links, with no executable installer, hidden command execution, prompt injection, or data exfiltration evidence.

1
Files scanned
553
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
1
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Low
Network Findings Are Database Calls and Reference Links
The fetch hit is a database query example, not an HTTP Fetch API call. The hardcoded URLs are resource links to CQRS documentation and do not send data.
Line 283 is inside a Python database access example. Lines 551 and 552 are Markdown references, with no code that performs outbound requests.
Low
Keyword Matches Are Benign CQRS Example Terms
Weak cryptography and reconnaissance alerts are keyword matches in architecture prose, sort order strings, UUID creation, SQL fields, and identifiers. No evidence found of cryptographic implementation, host inspection, or environment probing.
Manual review found normal CQRS terms and sample SQL at these lines. There is no code path that performs cryptography, system reconnaissance, or credential collection.
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Markdown Code Fences Misclassified as Shell Execution
The reported Ruby or shell backtick hits are Markdown code fence delimiters around diagrams and Python examples. No evidence found of executable shell commands or command injection behavior.
The matched tokens are Markdown code block delimiters. The surrounding content is a diagram or Python template text, not executable shell syntax.
Audited by: codex

Jan 17, 2026, 07:55 AM

Pure documentation skill containing Python code examples for CQRS architecture patterns. All 38 static findings are false positives: cryptographic flags triggered by words like 'segregation' and 'separation'; system reconnaissance flags from architectural terms like 'Command' and 'Query'; external_commands flags from markdown backticks; and network flags from legitimate documentation URLs.

2
Files scanned
729
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 07:55 AM

Pure documentation skill containing Python code examples for CQRS architecture patterns. All 38 static findings are false positives: cryptographic flags triggered by words like 'segregation' and 'separation'; system reconnaissance flags from architectural terms like 'Command' and 'Query'; external_commands flags from markdown backticks; and network flags from legitimate documentation URLs.

2
Files scanned
729
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 5, 2026, 04:57 PM

Pure documentation skill with Python code examples. No security risks detected - contains only educational content about CQRS patterns with no executable code, network calls, or file system access.

4
Files scanned
767
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 5, 2026, 04:57 PM

Pure documentation skill with Python code examples. No security risks detected - contains only educational content about CQRS patterns with no executable code, network calls, or file system access.

4
Files scanned
767
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude