📦

Audit History

async-python-patterns - 7 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v7 LatestJul 7, 2026, 07:41 AM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v6 Jul 7, 2026, 07:41 AM 1 confirmed0External commands
v5 Jun 30, 2026, 09:53 PM 1 confirmed0 External commands
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 07:15 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 07:15 AM No confirmed findings0Network accessExternal commands
v2 Jan 5, 2026, 04:54 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 5, 2026, 04:54 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 07:41 AM

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, placeholder URLs, or benign sample identifiers. One semantic issue remains: the database example builds SQL with f-string interpolation, which may teach unsafe query construction if copied.

1
Files scanned
695
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Unsafe SQL Construction in Example
The database example builds SQL strings with f-strings using user_id. Readers may copy this pattern instead of parameterized queries.
The code constructs three SQL queries through f-string interpolation. It is instructional sample code, so the risk is guidance quality rather than active execution.
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 07:41 AM

Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, placeholder URLs, or benign sample identifiers. One semantic issue remains: the database example builds SQL with f-string interpolation, which may teach unsafe query construction if copied.

1
Files scanned
695
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Unsafe SQL Construction in Example
The database example builds SQL strings with f-strings using user_id. Readers may copy this pattern instead of parameterized queries.
The code constructs three SQL queries through f-string interpolation. It is instructional sample code, so the risk is guidance quality rather than active execution.
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 09:53 PM

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but review found they are mostly false positives from Markdown backticks, Python code fences, and demonstration URLs. No prompt injection, credential exfiltration, hidden execution, or malicious intent was found in the reviewed SKILL.md content. A low-risk content issue remains because one educational database example uses string interpolation for SQL queries.

1
Files scanned
695
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
3
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Low
Educational SQL Example Uses String Interpolation
The async database example builds SQL queries with f-strings. Although the example is simulated and the parameter is typed as an integer, copied production code should use parameterized queries.
The code visibly interpolates a variable into SQL strings. Risk is limited because this is documentation-only sample code with an integer annotation and simulated database client.
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False Positive: Markdown Backticks Flagged as External Commands
The static command detections correspond to inline Markdown code spans and fenced Python examples. They do not contain shell execution instructions, subprocess calls, or user-controlled command execution.
The flagged lines are Markdown formatting boundaries or Python asyncio examples. No shell command execution primitive or command injection path was found.
Low
False Positive: Demonstration URLs in Educational Examples
The hardcoded URLs are example API, httpbin, and Python documentation URLs used to explain async HTTP patterns. No secrets, local files, environment variables, or user data are sent to these endpoints by the skill itself.
The network references appear only inside documentation examples and resource links. The skill contains no executable installer or runtime code that initiates network traffic.
Low
False Positive: Blocker Patterns Are Benign Documentation Text
The weak-crypto and reconnaissance matches are benign terms inside the skill description, list comprehensions, simulated database examples, object attributes, and best-practice prose. No cryptographic operation, system inventory collection, or host reconnaissance behavior was found.
Manual review of the matched contexts shows ordinary Python tutorial content. The matches do not perform crypto, inspect host state, or collect system details.

Detected Patterns

String-Interpolated SQL in Sample Code
Audited by: codex

Jan 5, 2026, 04:54 PM

Documentation-only skill containing Python async programming patterns. No executable code, network access, or security risks identified.

4
Files scanned
916
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 5, 2026, 04:54 PM

Documentation-only skill containing Python async programming patterns. No executable code, network access, or security risks identified.

4
Files scanned
916
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude