📦

Audit History

architecture-patterns - 9 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v9 LatestJul 7, 2026, 07:29 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v8 Jul 7, 2026, 07:29 AM No confirmed findings0External commandsEnv variables
v7 Jun 30, 2026, 09:50 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jun 30, 2026, 09:50 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v5 Jan 21, 2026, 06:52 PM No confirmed findings0 External commandsEnv variables
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 07:13 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 07:13 AM No confirmed findings0External commandsEnv variables
v2 Jan 4, 2026, 04:44 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 4, 2026, 04:44 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 07:29 AM

Static command, secret, and reconnaissance findings are false positives from Markdown fences and illustrative Python architecture examples. No evidence found of prompt injection, active command execution, real secret access, data exfiltration, or host reconnaissance in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
488
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 07:29 AM

Static command, secret, and reconnaissance findings are false positives from Markdown fences and illustrative Python architecture examples. No evidence found of prompt injection, active command execution, real secret access, data exfiltration, or host reconnaissance in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
488
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 09:50 PM

Static analysis reported 29 potential issues in SKILL.md, including external command, environment access, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance patterns. Review found these are false positives from Markdown code fences, architecture vocabulary, parameterized SQL examples, and illustrative API-key dependency injection. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, executable installer, network beacon, or malicious intent was found.

1
Files scanned
488
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False Positive: Markdown Code Fence Backticks
Static external command detections map to Markdown code fences and sample code block boundaries, not Ruby or shell execution. The file is documentation and does not define executable skill commands.
The flagged lines are literal Markdown triple-backtick delimiters. No shell command, command substitution, or runtime execution path is present.
Low
False Positive: Illustrative API Key Parameter
The environment-access alerts refer to an example Stripe adapter constructor and assignment. The example receives api_key as a parameter and does not read process environment variables or secrets from the host.
The code sample shows api_key as a function argument. There is no process.env, os.environ, filesystem secret read, or outbound exfiltration logic.
Low
False Positive: Architecture Terms And Identifiers
Weak-cryptography and reconnaissance alerts match words such as Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design, id fields, customer identifiers, and SQL examples. These are explanatory architecture examples, not cryptographic or host reconnaissance behavior.
The flagged text is ordinary architecture guidance and sample domain model code. No weak algorithm call, host inspection command, or system inventory collection appears.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 09:50 PM

Static analysis reported 29 potential issues in SKILL.md, including external command, environment access, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance patterns. Review found these are false positives from Markdown code fences, architecture vocabulary, parameterized SQL examples, and illustrative API-key dependency injection. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, executable installer, network beacon, or malicious intent was found.

1
Files scanned
488
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False Positive: Markdown Code Fence Backticks
Static external command detections map to Markdown code fences and sample code block boundaries, not Ruby or shell execution. The file is documentation and does not define executable skill commands.
The flagged lines are literal Markdown triple-backtick delimiters. No shell command, command substitution, or runtime execution path is present.
Low
False Positive: Illustrative API Key Parameter
The environment-access alerts refer to an example Stripe adapter constructor and assignment. The example receives api_key as a parameter and does not read process environment variables or secrets from the host.
The code sample shows api_key as a function argument. There is no process.env, os.environ, filesystem secret read, or outbound exfiltration logic.
Low
False Positive: Architecture Terms And Identifiers
Weak-cryptography and reconnaissance alerts match words such as Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design, id fields, customer identifiers, and SQL examples. These are explanatory architecture examples, not cryptographic or host reconnaissance behavior.
The flagged text is ordinary architecture guidance and sample domain model code. No weak algorithm call, host inspection command, or system inventory collection appears.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex

Jan 21, 2026, 06:52 PM

All 43 static analysis findings are false positives from educational code examples in documentation. The skill teaches software architecture patterns through Python examples showing Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. No executable code, network access, or security vulnerabilities present.

2
Files scanned
909
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 07:13 AM

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

2
Files scanned
664
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Detected Patterns

Weak cryptographic algorithmRuby/shell backtick executionGeneric API/secret keysSystem reconnaissance[HEURISTIC] DANGEROUS COMBINATION: Code execution + Network + Credential access
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 07:13 AM

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

2
Files scanned
664
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Detected Patterns

Weak cryptographic algorithmRuby/shell backtick executionGeneric API/secret keysSystem reconnaissance[HEURISTIC] DANGEROUS COMBINATION: Code execution + Network + Credential access
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 04:44 PM

The skill contains only documentation and code examples with no executable functionality, file access, network calls, or system interactions. It's purely educational content.

4
Files scanned
524
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 04:44 PM

The skill contains only documentation and code examples with no executable functionality, file access, network calls, or system interactions. It's purely educational content.

4
Files scanned
524
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude