# Validate Viral Social Posts

Draft posts often fail because weak hooks, pacing, or value are hard to see. This skill scores those factors and suggests sharper rewrites.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add wangdefou-dev/viral-verification
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: wangdefou-dev-viral-verification
- Skillstore revision: r1
- Version status: missing
- Tree hash: 9684a9386581b1a3a88a2f3a5f7421f53a5f4046d2ce86815966094505e69b26
- Author: wangdefou-dev
- GitHub username: wangdefou-dev
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/wangdefou-dev/defou-workflow-agent/tree/main/skills/viral-verification
- Ref: 36e07d5e13068e5be64447e8f20b427cf2cbd21a
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: confirmation\_required
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: external\_commands, filesystem, env\_access
- Quality score: 38
- Quality tier: warning
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/wangdefou-dev-viral-verification
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/wangdefou-dev-viral-verification/manifest

## Capabilities

- Scores draft content across curiosity, emotion, value, relevance, pacing, and novelty.
- Identifies strengths and weaknesses in a Markdown report.
- Suggests changes to titles, hooks, structure, and tone.
- Produces a rewritten version optimized for viral social sharing.
- Batch processes Markdown drafts from an outputs directory when run as a script.

## Use Cases

- Improve Launch Posts: Review launch copy before posting and receive stronger hooks, clearer value, and a cleaner final draft.
- Audit Social Calendars: Score scheduled posts and find weak drafts before they reach the publishing queue.
- Coach Content Writers: Show writers which viral factors are missing and provide concrete revision targets.

## Prompt Templates

### Score One Draft

```
Review this draft for viral potential. Score each factor and give three practical improvements: [paste draft].
```

### Rewrite With Constraints

```
Review and rewrite this post. Keep the claim accurate, keep the tone calm, and improve the opening hook: [paste draft].
```

### Compare Two Versions

```
Compare these two drafts. Explain which version has stronger viral factors, then create a final merged version: [paste drafts].
```

### Batch Review Plan

```
Review these drafts as a campaign set. Rank them, identify repeated weaknesses, and suggest a revision plan: [paste drafts].
```

## Limitations

- Requires an Anthropic API key and network access for automated script use.
- Designed for social posts and short articles, not long-form editorial review.
- Scores are model judgments and should not be treated as performance guarantees.
- The script reads local Markdown files and writes reports to a project output folder.

## Best Practices

- Provide the full draft and explain the target audience before asking for a rewrite.
- Review factual claims after every rewrite before publishing.
- Use scores as editing signals, not as guaranteed engagement predictions.

## Anti Patterns

- Do not use the rewrite to exaggerate claims or remove important context.
- Do not process confidential drafts without approval for external model use.
- Do not optimize for outrage when the topic requires accuracy and care.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-07-07T08:11:14.134\+00:00
- Summary: The command-execution findings are false positives caused by TypeScript template literals and Markdown code fences. Real concerns remain: the script loads a parent .env file, reads local input files, uses API credentials, and sends content to an external model endpoint. The skill needs clear disclosure, path restrictions, and safer secret handling before broad publication.

## Stats

- Views: 237
- Downloads: 42
- Favorites: 1
- Popularity score: 0