📦

Audit History

vue-options-api-best-practices - 4 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v4 LatestJul 7, 2026, 06:56 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jul 7, 2026, 06:56 AM No confirmed findings0External commandsNetwork access
v2 Jun 30, 2026, 10:55 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Feb 12, 2026, 08:56 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 06:56 AM

The static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, TypeScript template literals, Vue documentation links, and DOM event property names. No prompt injection, secret handling, command execution, or executable network behavior was found in the reviewed skill content.

11
Files scanned
1,509
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 06:56 AM

The static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, TypeScript template literals, Vue documentation links, and DOM event property names. No prompt injection, secret handling, command execution, or executable network behavior was found in the reviewed skill content.

11
Files scanned
1,509
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 10:55 PM

Static analysis reported 258 issues, but targeted review found they are false positives from Markdown examples and documentation links. The skill is documentation-only and contains no executable scripts, credential access, network exfiltration, or prompt injection attempts. Safe to publish.

11
Files scanned
1,509
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
1
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Static Analysis Findings Dismissed as Documentation False Positives
The external command alerts are Markdown fences and inline backticks around Vue and TypeScript examples. The network alerts are reference links and one local fetch example. The weak crypto, certificate, and reconnaissance alerts match words such as key, KeyboardEvent, keyof, and documentation metadata. No executable scripts, credential access, or data exfiltration behavior was found.
The flagged content is inside Markdown documentation or reference links, not runnable marketplace skill code. Targeted review found no prompt injection, shell execution, credential access, or external data transfer instructions.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex

Feb 12, 2026, 08:56 AM

Static analysis detected 258 potential security issues, all are false positives from markdown code blocks. The 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' findings are JavaScript code examples in markdown fences. 'Hardcoded URL' findings are Vue.js documentation links. 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' findings trigger on the word 'key' in event.key and YAML frontmatter. No actual security risks exist.

11
Files scanned
1,509
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
1
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Static Analysis False Positives
All 258 detected security issues are false positives from markdown documentation files. The static analyzer incorrectly flagged: (1) JavaScript code examples in markdown code blocks as 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' due to backtick syntax; (2) Vue.js documentation links as 'hardcoded URLs'; (3) The word 'key' in 'event.key' and YAML 'impactDescription' as 'weak cryptographic algorithm'. These are documentation files, not executable code.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude