# Verify Reactive Form Inputs Without Submitting

A form can display the expected value while application state or validation remains unchanged. This skill guides evidence-based checks and reports input acceptance without submitting the form.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add tdw8147-crypto/reactive-form-input
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: tdw8147-crypto-reactive-form-input
- Skillstore revision: r1
- Version status: missing
- Tree hash: b6f63dc88350a52d501f1e5608f76262f4b0741761cbfcdac9979c380be92c55
- Author: tdw8147-crypto
- GitHub username: tdw8147-crypto
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/tdw8147-crypto/skill-delivery-kit/tree/30eb4e17579f14a1ee3b7c7511ef744fbccdf9a9/reactive-form-input
- Ref: adb2002886201d63023cfc1c87abcd43adc1ac29
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: allowed
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: filesystem, external\_commands
- Quality score: 78
- Quality tier: bronze
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/tdw8147-crypto-reactive-form-input
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/tdw8147-crypto-reactive-form-input/manifest

## Capabilities

- Guides identification of the visible, editable field within its current page and parent form, excluding hidden duplicates.
- Separates displayed values from field-specific validation, dependent controls, and application state evidence.
- Classifies input as effective, not effective, validating, or unverified using the available evidence.
- Defines one bounded next observation with an expected completion signal or a clear stopping point.
- Produces structured records from live observations or supplied notes while distinguishing proposed actions from completed interactions.
- Requires sensitive value masking, normal input methods, and stopping before final form submission or request replay.

## Use Cases

- Check Controlled Input Acceptance: Separate a displayed contact value from the application model and identify whether normal input needs another authorized check.
- Assess Pending Validation: Record a workspace slug availability check, preserve the requested value, and observe within a fixed budget without creating the workspace.
- Summarize Supplied Form Evidence: Turn page notes into an input effectiveness record that names missing evidence and avoids claiming a live interaction occurred.

## Prompt Templates

### Interpret a Visible Value

```
The contact email field looks filled, but I have no validation evidence. Classify what is known without browser access or submission. Name the missing evidence.
```

### Choose the Correct Field

```
The profile form has a visible contact field, a hidden duplicate, and a similar header search. Plan an authorized check of the visible field. Specify replacement behavior and evidence needed without submitting.
```

### Observe Asynchronous Validation

```
The workspace slug matches the requested value and shows Checking availability. In the authorized browser session, observe for at most five seconds. Report the last field-specific state without changing the slug or creating the workspace.
```

### Assess Evidence After Navigation

```
The supplied notes describe a DOM write before navigation and a disabled Save button afterward. The button depends on several fields. Produce an evidence record distinguishing page contexts, supplied observations, and proposed actions. Name one bounded next check without saving or replaying requests.
```

## Limitations

- Provides workflow instructions and examples, not an executable browser automation tool or test suite.
- Requires authorized browser access and suitable tools for live checks; supplied notes alone cannot establish unobserved application state.
- Does not implement validation logic, repair application state synchronization, or confirm successful business submission.
- Cannot confirm acceptance without a relevant application signal and must stop if further evidence requires final submission.

## Best Practices

- Record the page context, parent form, visible field identity, expected format, and replacement method before evaluating acceptance.
- Mask sensitive values and distinguish live observations, supplied notes, and proposed actions.
- Use field-specific signals with a bounded observation window, and stop before final submission or replay.

## Anti Patterns

- Treating a DOM assignment or matching display as proof that the application accepted the input.
- Using a disabled button alone to reject a field, or reporting pending validation as a settled failure.
- Force-enabling controls, silently changing the requested value, or submitting the form to obtain more evidence.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-11-10T10:48:20.399\+00:00
- Summary: All 12 static findings are false positives involving documentation links, installation paths, Markdown formatting, status labels, or readable Chinese text. The workflow requires authorized interaction, sensitive value masking, bounded observation, and no final form submission. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, executable payloads, or malicious intent.

## Stats

- Views: 0
- Downloads: 0
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0