Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-78C33630

6/30/2026, 8:01:17 PM

naming-analyzer security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
naming-analyzer
Version
v2
Maintainer
softaworks
Source
github.com/softaworks/agent-toolkit/tree/main/skills/naming-analyzer/
Coverage
2 Files scanned · 573 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Low

3 confirmed security findings require attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported many command, environment, weak crypto, and reconnaissance patterns, but review found they are markdown examples and naming text. No executable files, network calls, secret collection, or prompt injection attempts were found in the reviewed files. The remaining risk is low because the skill can guide broad refactoring, which should stay under explicit user control.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

2 Files scanned · 573 Lines analyzed

3 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (3)

RISK-001 Low
SKILL.md:113-115
Environment Access Appears Only in a Documentation Example
The environment variable access finding is a code example for acceptable abbreviations. It does not instruct the model to read secrets, enumerate environment variables, or transmit configuration values.
The example is embedded in a markdown section about naming abbreviations. No surrounding instruction asks the model to access or expose environment data.
RISK-002 Low
README.md:185-186SKILL.md:126-127SKILL.md:283-284
System Reconnaissance Findings Are Naming Text
The reconnaissance findings are false positives from words such as env and generic naming examples. The reviewed lines do not request host inspection, system enumeration, or command execution.
The cited context is about code style and identifier clarity. There is no semantic evidence of reconnaissance behavior.
RISK-003 Low
README.md:109-112SKILL.md:300-307
Refactoring Guidance Should Remain User Controlled
The skill says it can generate refactoring scripts and suggests a fix-all mode. This is legitimate coding assistance, but broad renaming can affect many files and should require explicit user approval before edits run.
The capability is clearly documented and legitimate, but it could cause project-wide changes if used carelessly. No malicious automation or forced execution was found.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (2)
Low
README.md:46-52README.md:96-107README.md:176-181SKILL.md:45-49SKILL.md:72-82SKILL.md:148-154SKILL.md:278-296
Markdown Naming Examples Misclassified as Shell Execution
The external command findings are false positives from inline code formatting and fenced examples. The reviewed text shows naming conventions such as camelCase, PascalCase, snake_case, and sample identifiers, not shell execution or Ruby backticks.
The cited lines are markdown documentation and code examples for naming style. There is no executable wrapper, shell invocation, or runtime script in the skill.
Low
README.md:10README.md:77-81README.md:158-160README.md:177README.md:196README.md:211SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:127SKILL.md:288SKILL.md:315SKILL.md:341
Weak Cryptography Findings Are Keyword False Positives
The weak cryptography findings do not correspond to hashing, encryption, or password handling logic. The cited lines contain normal prose, report labels, or naming examples rather than MD5, SHA1, DES, or similar implementations.
Manual review found no cryptographic API or algorithm use at these locations. The static detector appears to have matched substrings inside documentation text.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable