Audit History
multiplayer - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Aug 4, 2026, 03:18 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 7, 2026, 12:26 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 7, 2026, 12:26 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 04:01 PM | 1 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Feb 25, 2026, 11:19 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Aug 4, 2026, 03:18 PM
All five static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences and ordinary server-validation prose. The skill provides conceptual multiplayer guidance without executable commands, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or other semantic threats.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (3)
Jul 7, 2026, 12:26 AM
The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences and game-server validation prose in SKILL.md. No prompt injection, malicious intent, command execution, data exfiltration, or reconnaissance behavior was found in the reviewed skill content.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (3)
Jul 7, 2026, 12:26 AM
The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences and game-server validation prose in SKILL.md. No prompt injection, malicious intent, command execution, data exfiltration, or reconnaissance behavior was found in the reviewed skill content.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (3)
Jun 30, 2026, 04:01 PM
Static analysis flagged shell execution, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance patterns, but the referenced lines are Markdown diagrams and game design guidance. No evidence found of executable commands, malicious intent, data exfiltration, prompt injection, or unsafe cryptographic implementation.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Feb 25, 2026, 11:19 AM
Static scanner detected backtick patterns in markdown code blocks, falsely identifying them as shell execution. These are markdown formatting characters, not executable code. The skill is pure educational documentation about multiplayer game development with no executable code, external commands, or security risks. All findings are false positives.
Static false positives ignored (1)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.