Skills multi-agent-brainstorming Audit History
📦

Audit History

multi-agent-brainstorming - 5 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v5 LatestAug 4, 2026, 03:08 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jul 7, 2026, 01:41 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jul 7, 2026, 01:41 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v2 Jun 30, 2026, 05:00 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Feb 25, 2026, 11:04 AM 1 confirmed0Baseline
Audit version 5 Latest

Aug 4, 2026, 03:08 PM

All four static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks or ordinary review language. The skill contains no shell execution, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or other semantic security issue.

1
Files scanned
262
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (2)
SKILL.md:48 SKILL.md:155
Audited by: codex
Audit version 4

Jul 7, 2026, 01:41 AM

All four static findings are false positives. The two backtick findings are Markdown references to a brainstorming skill, and the blocker findings are design-review process guidance. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
257
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (2)
SKILL.md:50 SKILL.md:157
Audited by: codex
Audit version 3

Jul 7, 2026, 01:41 AM

All four static findings are false positives. The two backtick findings are Markdown references to a brainstorming skill, and the blocker findings are design-review process guidance. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
257
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (2)
SKILL.md:50 SKILL.md:157
Audited by: codex
Audit version 2

Jun 30, 2026, 05:00 PM

Static analysis flagged external commands, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance terms, but review found only Markdown prose and inline code formatting. No executable scripts, network access, filesystem access, credential handling, or prompt injection attempts were found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
257
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
SKILL.md:50SKILL.md:157
False Positive: Markdown Skill Reference Flagged as Command Execution
The two external command detections are Markdown references to the brainstorming skill. They do not execute Ruby, shell, or any external command.
Both locations are instructional Markdown bullets with inline code formatting. No shell syntax, script block, or execution mechanism is present.
Low
SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:4SKILL.md:6SKILL.md:11SKILL.md:15SKILL.md:20SKILL.md:22SKILL.md:26SKILL.md:32SKILL.md:38SKILL.md:46SKILL.md:49SKILL.md:55SKILL.md:56SKILL.md:59SKILL.md:68SKILL.md:79SKILL.md:83SKILL.md:101SKILL.md:128SKILL.md:143SKILL.md:144SKILL.md:155SKILL.md:157SKILL.md:159SKILL.md:179SKILL.md:181SKILL.md:189SKILL.md:208SKILL.md:220SKILL.md:228SKILL.md:232SKILL.md:241SKILL.md:253
False Positive: Weak Cryptography Pattern Matched Prose
The weak cryptography detections appear to match ordinary documentation text about design review. No cryptographic API, hash function, cipher, or implementation code is present.
The file is documentation-only Markdown about design review roles and process. No weak cryptographic primitive or cryptography-related behavior appears at the cited locations.
Low
SKILL.md:208SKILL.md:253
False Positive: Reconnaissance Pattern Matched Documentation
The system reconnaissance detections occur in plain documentation about design validity and failure review. They do not invoke commands or inspect the host system.
The cited lines are natural-language Markdown sentences. There is no command syntax, subprocess call, or request for system information.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex
Audit version 1

Feb 25, 2026, 11:04 AM

All static findings are false positives. The skill is a legitimate multi-agent design review framework. Detected patterns are markdown formatting (backticks for skill references) and design review terminology, not actual security threats. No malicious code, commands, or cryptographic algorithms present.

1
Files scanned
262
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
1
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Low
SKILL.md:3-4SKILL.md:210SKILL.md:255
Terminology Misinterpretation
Scanner detected 'weak cryptographic algorithm' and 'system reconnaissance' patterns. These are false positives from design review terminology in the document text.
Keywords like 'risk', 'unknown', 'source' in YAML frontmatter and 'validation', 'design' terminology were misinterpreted by pattern scanner. No crypto code or reconnaissance behavior exists.
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Medium
SKILL.md:52SKILL.md:159
Markdown Backtick False Positive
Static scanner detected 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' at SKILL.md:52 and 159. These are markdown backticks referencing the 'brainstorming' skill, not shell commands.
The backticks are used in markdown to format skill names like `brainstorming` skill, not shell command execution. No shell commands exist in this file.
Audited by: claude
← Back to Skill