Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-96B4424A

6/30/2026, 4:43:43 PM

malware-analyst security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
malware-analyst
Version
v2
Maintainer
sickn33
Source
github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/malware-analyst
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 248 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis flagged many malware-analysis terms and command examples, but review found them in defensive documentation rather than hidden execution logic. The skill is publishable with a warning because it covers dual-use malware handling and advises executing samples during dynamic analysis.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 248 Lines analyzed

3 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 22 evidence locations

Capability review items (3)
Medium
SKILL.md:36-56SKILL.md:240-247
Dual-use malware sample execution guidance
The dynamic analysis workflow tells users to execute a sample and trigger network behavior. This is legitimate for authorized malware analysis, but it can be unsafe outside an isolated lab.
The instructions explicitly describe controlled dynamic analysis and sample execution. The surrounding context is defensive, so the risk is operational misuse rather than confirmed malicious intent.
Medium
SKILL.md:75-109SKILL.md:224-238
Sensitive malware capability taxonomy
The skill lists persistence, evasion, C2, and living-off-the-land techniques. The content is framed for identification and reporting, but it is dual-use security knowledge.
The terminology is clearly present and relevant to malware operations. The ethical guidelines reduce concern because they prohibit creating malware, botnets, C2 infrastructure, and unauthorized attacks.
Low
SKILL.md:12-27SKILL.md:167-183SKILL.md:185-222
Command examples are documentation, not hidden execution
The Ruby or shell backtick findings map to markdown fences and command examples for tools such as file, strings, FLOSS, rabin2, and dumpbin. No executable script or automation hook was found.
The file contains markdown guidance only, and the flagged backticks are code-fence markers. I did not find evidence of code that would execute commands automatically.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (3)
Low
SKILL.md:89-109SKILL.md:113-119SKILL.md:233-238
C2, PowerShell, and sandbox terms are contextual false positives
The C2, PowerShell, certutil, social-media, and Hybrid Analysis references appear in defensive behavior and tooling lists. They do not provide offensive build instructions.
The suspicious terms are present, but they are embedded in a defensive taxonomy and an explicit refusal list. No evidence found of operational C2 setup instructions.
Low
SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:151-154SKILL.md:172SKILL.md:196-200
Weak crypto alerts are false positives or IOC context
The scanner cited metadata and YARA description lines that do not use cryptography. MD5 and SHA1 appear only as file hash indicators.
The weak algorithms are listed beside SHA256 as sample identifiers. This is common IOC practice and not evidence of insecure cryptographic design.
Low
SKILL.md:1-248
No prompt injection evidence found
Review found no claims of special authority, system overrides, skipped analysis, or requests to ignore prior instructions.
The full file was reviewed for prompt-injection language. No evidence found of instruction override attempts or marketplace audit manipulation.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable