Audit History

All seven static findings are false positives. The backticks delimit a Markdown path, while the other matches are ordinary incident-response prose and telemetry guidance. No prompt injection, exfiltration intent, executable code, or unauthorized reconnaissance was found.

The static external command finding is a Markdown formatting false positive. The reconnaissance findings describe authorized SRE incident response activities, and no prompt injection or exfiltration intent was found in SKILL.md.

The static command and reconnaissance matches are mostly false positives caused by markdown references and incident-response terminology. I found a separate medium-risk operational safety issue: the skill asks agents to implement mitigations and emergency deployments without explicit approval gates.

Static analysis reported shell execution, weak cryptography, system reconnaissance, and network reconnaissance patterns. Review found these are false positives caused by Markdown backticks and incident response terminology, with no executable code, no cryptographic implementation, and no hostile reconnaissance instructions. The skill does ask agents to coordinate high-impact operational tasks, so users should apply normal change-control safeguards.

All 11 static findings are false positives. The skill is a legitimate incident response workflow guide (markdown documentation). The 'external_commands' detection refers to markdown backticks for file paths, not shell execution. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' and 'system/network reconnaissance' detections are scanner misinterpretations of incident response terminology (severity levels, observability analysis, root cause analysis). No actual security risks present.