# Build Shared Apple Design Context

Repeated discovery questions slow Apple design reviews and create inconsistent guidance. This skill builds a shared context document from project evidence and confirmed requirements.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add sickn33/hig-project-context
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: sickn33-hig-project-context
- Skillstore revision: r2
- Version status: missing
- Tree hash: 47deb8cfc434c0ddf9b11d5ee731705c10e382d5bcb6b347c7ff579003c8181e
- Author: sickn33
- GitHub username: sickn33
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/hig-project-context
- Ref: 88a8e9a07f4c54ab105c1c41b6267c287146b07b
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: allowed
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: external\_commands, network
- Quality score: 79
- Quality tier: bronze
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/sickn33-hig-project-context
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/sickn33-hig-project-context/manifest

## Capabilities

- Reviews project documentation, configuration, code imports, assets, and accessibility usage for relevant context.
- Identifies supported Apple platforms, minimum operating systems, frameworks, architecture, and Apple technologies.
- Collects product, design system, accessibility, user, and existing asset requirements.
- Presents discovered information for user confirmation before completing missing details.
- Creates or selectively updates \`.claude/apple-design-context.md\` with a consistent structure.

## Use Cases

- Start a New Apple App: Capture platform, framework, design, accessibility, and user decisions before detailed interface work begins.
- Document an Existing Codebase: Extract verified design context from project files so future HIG guidance reflects the current implementation.
- Prepare a Design Review: Consolidate product constraints and accessibility goals before reviewing patterns, components, or platform conventions.

## Prompt Templates

### Create Basic Context

```
Create the Apple design context for this project. Review available files, show your findings, and ask me to confirm missing details.
```

### Update Existing Context

```
Review the existing Apple design context and update only the sections affected by these changes: [describe changes].
```

### Focus on Accessibility

```
Build or update the project context with emphasis on accessibility goals, current implementation evidence, user needs, and regulatory requirements.
```

### Reconcile Context with Code

```
Compare the current Apple design context with project files. Identify conflicts, request confirmation, and revise only verified sections.
```

## Limitations

- It depends on available project files and accurate user confirmation.
- It does not validate interface quality or guarantee Apple HIG compliance.
- It does not replace accessibility testing, legal review, or device testing.
- It updates only the shared context document and does not modify application code.

## Best Practices

- Confirm discovered facts before writing or changing the shared context document.
- Record concrete platform versions, frameworks, accessibility goals, and user environments.
- Update only changed sections and preserve verified information.

## Anti Patterns

- Do not assume requirements that project files and the user have not confirmed.
- Do not replace the entire context document when only one section changed.
- Do not treat the context document as proof of HIG or accessibility compliance.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-07-23T23:56:52.338\+00:00
- Summary: All five external-command findings are false positives caused by inline backticks and a fenced Markdown template. The hardcoded URLs are attribution links, not instructions to perform network requests, and no semantic security issue was found.

## Stats

- Views: 93
- Downloads: 15
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0