Audit History
geo-fundamentals - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Jul 23, 2026, 11:29 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 10:43 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 11:44 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 04:52 PM | 2 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Feb 25, 2026, 02:15 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 23, 2026, 11:29 PM
The only static finding is a false positive: SKILL.md line 157 contains a Markdown-formatted usage command, not Ruby or shell execution. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or other semantic security issue was found in the reviewed files.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jul 8, 2026, 10:43 AM
The static finding is a false positive caused by a documented command example in SKILL.md. The Python helper reads local project files for GEO signals and does not show malicious intent, prompt injection, or unsafe command execution.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jul 6, 2026, 11:44 PM
The static finding is a false positive caused by Markdown inline code that documents a local Python command. The skill content and script focus on local GEO guidance and page checks, with no prompt injection or data exfiltration intent found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jun 30, 2026, 04:52 PM
Manual review found that the static findings are false positives. The weak cryptography alerts at SKILL.md:3 and SKILL.md:64 are ordinary documentation text, and the duplicate external command alerts at SKILL.md:155 are a documented script invocation, not shell or Ruby backtick execution. No prompt injection, malicious intent, credential access, network exfiltration, or destructive behavior was found in the reviewed context.
Confirmed security concerns (2)
Feb 25, 2026, 02:15 AM
Static analysis flagged potential issues (external_commands, weak cryptographic algorithm) but manual review confirms these are false positives. The skill is documentation about GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) with a read-only Python script that analyzes local HTML/JSX/TSX files. No network requests, no command injection vectors, no cryptographic code present.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.