Audit History
fp-ts-react - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Jul 23, 2026, 10:33 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 09:40 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 10:59 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 03:11 PM | 1 confirmed | 0 | Network access |
| v1 | Feb 25, 2026, 12:31 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 23, 2026, 10:33 PM
All 85 static findings are false positives in Markdown documentation and TypeScript examples. Backticks format code or form template literals, while fetch calls use illustrative relative endpoints. No prompt injection, secret access, obfuscation, reconnaissance, or hidden command behavior was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (50)
🌐 Network access (8)
Jul 8, 2026, 09:40 AM
All 85 static findings were adjudicated as false positives in this Markdown documentation skill. The evidence consists of fp-ts and React examples, relative API calls, package documentation links, and type names. No evidence found of executable malware behavior, credential access, data exfiltration, or prompt injection.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (70)
🌐 Network access (8)
Jul 6, 2026, 10:59 PM
Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, TypeScript examples, and documentation links. I found no prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, host reconnaissance, or executable skill code in SKILL.md.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (70)
🌐 Network access (8)
Jun 30, 2026, 03:11 PM
Static analysis flagged many patterns, but review found they are Markdown examples and library references rather than executable skill logic. The Ruby backtick, weak crypto, certificate, reconnaissance, and obfuscation findings are false positives caused by inline TypeScript, tables, and prose. The only real risk indicator is educational fetch usage in sample React code, so publication is acceptable with low risk.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Static false positives ignored (1)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (3)
Feb 25, 2026, 12:31 AM
All 91 static analysis findings are false positives. The SKILL.md file is documentation containing TypeScript code examples in markdown format. Detected 'external_commands' are markdown backtick code blocks, not shell execution. Network findings reference example URLs in documentation. No executable code or actual security risks present.