📦
content-creator
88Create Brand-Consistent Marketing Content
Marketing teams need content that stays consistent across channels. This skill helps plan, write, analyze, and optimize content for brand voice and SEO.
Writing & Content View
Skills error-debugging-multi-agent-review
📦
error-debugging-multi-agent-review
Content revision r2 Safe ⚙️ External commands
Coordinate Multi-Agent Code Reviews
Single-perspective reviews can miss security, architecture, performance, and quality concerns. This skill coordinates specialized reviewers and synthesizes their findings into one prioritized assessment.
Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "error-debugging-multi-agent-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "error-debugging-multi-agent-review". Review this payment service for release readiness.
Expected outcome:
- Critical: Authorization checks are missing from the refund path. Verify with an unauthorized request test.
- Important: Retry behavior can duplicate payment requests. Add idempotency coverage before release.
- Decision: Block release until both findings are resolved and verified.
Using "error-debugging-multi-agent-review". Compare security and architecture feedback for this API change.
Expected outcome:
Both reviewers identify excessive service access as the main risk. Restrict permissions first, then repeat the architecture boundary review.
Using "error-debugging-multi-agent-review". Plan a hybrid review for a performance-sensitive web application.
Expected outcome:
- Run security and performance reviews in parallel using the same request-flow context.
- Pass validated findings to the architecture reviewer for dependency analysis.
- Synthesize evidence, disagreements, confidence, and required verification into the final report.
Security Audit
Safev5 • 7/23/2026 Open versioned report
All 21 external-command findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks or Python code fences; the examples contain no shell execution. The two reconnaissance findings are review-strategy headings, not host discovery, and no prompt injection or other semantic threat was found.
1
Files scanned
225
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (21)
SKILL.md:26 SKILL.md:44 SKILL.md:65-76 SKILL.md:76-84 SKILL.md:84-93 SKILL.md:93-101 SKILL.md:101-114 SKILL.md:114-122 SKILL.md:122-131 SKILL.md:131-139 SKILL.md:139-143 SKILL.md:143-151 SKILL.md:151-154 SKILL.md:154-162 SKILL.md:162-166 SKILL.md:166-171 SKILL.md:171-180 SKILL.md:180-183 SKILL.md:183-190 SKILL.md:190-193 SKILL.md:193-198
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review/audits/5?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
sickn33. (2026). error-debugging-multi-agent-review security audit report (audit version 5) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review/audits/5BibTeX citation
@techreport{sickn33-sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review-2026,
author = {sickn33},
title = {error-debugging-multi-agent-review security audit report (audit version 5)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {5},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review/audits/5},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "error-debugging-multi-agent-review security audit report (audit version 5)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "sickn33"
date-released: "2026-07-23"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review/audits/5"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:sickn33-error-debugging-multi-agent-review:audit:5"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: High 55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
69
Community
83
Spec Compliance
What You Can Build
Review a Feature Before Merge
Coordinate code quality and security perspectives, then combine duplicate findings into a prioritized merge assessment.
Assess Application Risk
Route application code through security, compliance, and architecture reviews while preserving evidence and confidence levels.
Evaluate Release Readiness
Combine architecture, performance, testing, and deployment reviews into a sequenced decision with clear blockers.
Try These Prompts
Basic Two-Perspective Review
Review [target] with code quality and security perspectives. List findings by severity, cite evidence, and state verification steps.
Parallel Specialist Review
Coordinate parallel security, architecture, and performance reviews for [target]. Merge duplicate findings and explain disagreements before prioritizing actions.
Sequential Release Review
Design a sequential review for [target]. Let architecture findings inform implementation review, then evaluate tests and deployment readiness.
Advanced Hybrid Orchestration
Create a hybrid multi-agent review for [target] under [constraints]. Define routing, shared context, conflict resolution, confidence scoring, and final acceptance criteria.
Best Practices
- Define review scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria before selecting agents.
- Keep independent reviews parallel, but sequence reviews that depend on earlier findings.
- Require evidence, confidence, and verification steps for every prioritized finding.
Avoid
- Do not assign every reviewer when the target only needs focused analysis.
- Do not merge conflicting recommendations without recording the disagreement and rationale.
- Do not treat synthesized advice as proof without tests or environment-specific validation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What inputs can this skill review?
It accepts code snippets, file paths, repository context, constraints, and requested review areas.
Does this skill execute code or commands?
No. The included material is orchestration guidance with illustrative Python pseudocode. Use external tools separately for tests or analysis.
Which review perspectives are supported?
The guidance covers code quality, security, architecture, performance, compliance, testing, and deployment readiness.
How are conflicting findings handled?
The workflow compares evidence, applies weighted scoring, and escalates unresolved conflicts for explicit review.
Can the final report replace testing?
No. Confirm recommendations with project-specific tests, runtime checks, and qualified human review.
How should sensitive code be handled?
Limit shared context, remove secrets, enforce repository permissions, and send each reviewer only the information required.
Developer Details
Author
sickn33License
MIT
Skillstore revision
r2
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
88a8e9a07f4c54ab105c1c41b6267c287146b07b
Maintenance freshness
7/26/2026
Usage
12 downloads · 104 views
File structure
📄 SKILL.md
More from sickn33
View all📦
prompt-engineering-patterns
85Improve LLM Prompts With Proven Patterns
Inconsistent prompts waste time and make AI outputs hard to trust. This skill guides prompt design with reusable patterns, examples, evaluation steps, and optimization workflows.
Productivity View
📦
senior-fullstack
82Build Fullstack Apps with Senior Patterns
Teams need consistent setup, architecture, and review guidance for modern web applications. This skill provides scaffolders, workflow references, and quality prompts for React, Next.js, Node.js, GraphQL, and PostgreSQL projects.
Coding & Development View
📦
senior-architect
81Design Scalable Software Architectures
Architecture decisions are hard to compare across web, mobile, backend, and cloud systems. This skill provides structured guides and local scaffold scripts for reports, dependency review, and trade-off documentation.
Coding & Development View
📦
prompt-engineer
81Optimize AI Prompts With Prompt Engineer
Writing clear prompts is hard when goals are vague or complex. This skill turns rough requests into structured prompts using proven prompt frameworks.
Productivity View
📦
product-manager-toolkit
80Prioritize Product Work With Research Insights
Product teams need faster ways to rank features, synthesize interviews, and document decisions. This skill provides RICE scoring, interview analysis, and PRD templates for structured planning.
Productivity View
Related Skills
View all📦
nextjs-architecture
81Plan Next.js App Router Architecture
by 89jobrien
Next.js teams can struggle to choose routes, components, data loading, and migration steps. This skill gives structured architecture guidance for App Router, Server Components, and performance.
Coding & Development View
📦
vercel-react-best-practices
80Optimize React and Next.js Code
by vercel-labs
React and Next.js applications often lose performance through waterfalls, large bundles, and avoidable re-renders. This skill gives Claude, Codex, and Claude Code concrete review rules for faster frontend work.
Coding & Development View
📦
examples-code-reviewer
80Review Code with Structured AI Feedback
by EnactProtocol
Manual code review can miss bugs, style problems, and risky patterns when context is limited. This skill reviews provided code and returns prioritized issues, suggestions, a summary, and a quality score.
Coding & Development View
📦
code-reviewer
83Review Code with Structured Quality Checks
by alirezarezvani
Code reviews can miss quality, security, and maintainability issues. This skill guides structured reviews with scripts, checklists, and report generation.
Coding & Development View
📦
vue-best-practices
82Improve Vue 3 Code Quality
by vuejs-ai
Vue projects often collect reactivity, component, and performance mistakes over time. This skill gives targeted Vue 3 guidance for safer patterns and clearer code.
Coding & Development View
📦
golang-performance
82Optimize Go Performance with Profiling
by 89jobrien
Go services can become slow or memory-heavy without clear evidence. This skill guides profiling, allocation analysis, concurrency tuning, and benchmark-driven optimization.
Coding & Development View