Audit History

All 184 static detections are false positives from documentation examples. Dynamic imports use fixed local project directories, shard spawning uses Discord.js ShardingManager, and credential examples use environment variables only for Discord authentication. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, shell execution, or reconnaissance intent was found.

All static findings are in SKILL.md documentation examples, not executable marketplace code. I found no prompt injection or evidence of data exfiltration. Token and .env references are presented as standard Discord bot configuration and safety guidance.

The reviewed skill is documentation with embedded Discord.js and Pycord examples, not installable executable code. Static findings mostly point to Markdown fences, local module loading examples, and standard environment-token handling; I found no prompt injection, exfiltration intent, or malicious behavior.

Static analysis reported many high and critical patterns, but the reviewed file is a Markdown skill containing Discord bot examples rather than executable marketplace scripts. The critical heuristic and weak-crypto flags are false positives from combined example snippets and slash-command terminology. The main residual risk is that copied examples use dynamic local module loading, filesystem enumeration, and Discord token environment access, which are legitimate but require secure project hygiene.

All 45 static findings are false positives. The skill contains standard Discord bot patterns (dynamic require for command loading, fs.readdirSync for directory scanning, environment variable access for bot tokens, and Discord gateway connections). These are required for legitimate Discord bot functionality and do not pose security risks.