Audit History
data-engineering-data-pipeline - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Jul 23, 2026, 10:13 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 10:19 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 10:56 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 02:56 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Feb 24, 2026, 06:40 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 23, 2026, 10:13 PM
All four static alerts are false positives caused by ordinary data engineering prose and a fenced Python example. No shell execution, reconnaissance behavior, prompt injection, or malicious intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jul 8, 2026, 10:19 AM
The static findings are false positives caused by ordinary data engineering terminology and a Python markdown code fence. No malicious intent, prompt injection, executable helper script, or unsafe command pattern was found in SKILL.md.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jul 6, 2026, 10:56 PM
All four static findings are false positives in the reviewed SKILL.md context. The flagged locations are data engineering prose or a Python example block, with no shell execution, system probing, network scanning, or prompt injection intent found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jun 30, 2026, 02:56 PM
The static analyzer reported external command, weak cryptography, system reconnaissance, and network reconnaissance patterns. Manual review found these are false positives caused by markdown fences and ordinary data engineering terminology, with no executable command, malware intent, prompt injection, or exfiltration behavior.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Feb 24, 2026, 06:40 PM
All static analyzer findings are false positives. The skill is documentation-only, providing architectural guidance and educational code examples. No executable code, external commands, or security risks detected. Safe for publication.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.