Audit History

All 12 static findings are false positives caused by database client methods, ordinary identifiers, UUID generation, and Markdown code formatting. No malicious intent, prompt injection, external command execution, or network request was found.

All 12 static findings are false positives from documentation examples. The skill contains CQRS guidance with parameterized database examples and Markdown resource references, with no prompt injection or data exfiltration intent found.

All 12 static findings were false positives after context review. The fetch call is a database read in sample code, and the backtick detections are Markdown links. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

Static analysis reported shell execution, weak cryptography, network, and reconnaissance patterns. Review found these are Markdown fences, architecture text, database query examples, and documentation links, with no executable skill code or prompt injection evidence. The remaining risk is low because users may adapt sample SQL and API patterns without adding their own validation and authorization.

Static analysis detected 30 potential issues, but all are false positives. The scanner misidentified markdown code fences as shell execution, database queries as network fetches, documentation URLs as suspicious, and sort order strings as weak cryptography. This is a legitimate CQRS educational skill with Python code templates. No actual security risks identified.