The only static finding is a false positive caused by Markdown inline-code backticks around related skill names in SKILL.md line 70. No evidence found of command execution, prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or executable code.
The only static finding is a false positive caused by Markdown inline-code backticks around related skill names in SKILL.md line 70. No evidence found of command execution, prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or executable code.
Static findings were evaluated against the Markdown content and dismissed as false positives. The SAM references are Segment Anything Model terminology, and the backticks on line 70 format related skill names rather than execute commands.
1
Files scanned
71
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
The static analyzer flagged SAM references as Windows SAM database indicators. In context, SAM means Segment Anything Model for computer vision segmentation.
Every cited SAM use appears in computer vision prose about segmentation, tracking, and VRAM usage. No Windows credential store access is described.
The weak cryptography detections occur in descriptive computer vision text. No hashing, encryption, credential handling, or cryptographic API usage appears.
The file contains conceptual Markdown guidance only. I found no code path that performs cryptographic operations or processes secrets.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
All static findings are false positives. The scanner detected 'SAM' as Windows SAM database (actually Segment Anything Model), backticks as shell execution (actually skill name formatting), and misidentified cryptographic patterns. This is a legitimate computer vision expert skill with no security concerns.
1
Files scanned
73
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Scanner detected 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' at line 72, but this is simply skill names in backticks (`ai-engineer`, `robotics-expert`). No actual shell execution present.
Line 72 contains only comma-separated skill names in backticks, no code execution. Pattern match is a false positive from regex.
Scanner flagged 'Windows SAM database' at multiple lines, but 'SAM' here refers to Segment Anything Model (SAM 3), a Meta computer vision model, not the Windows Security Account Manager.
All references to 'SAM' in this document clearly refer to 'SAM 3' (Segment Anything Model 3), a computer vision segmentation model, not the Windows security database.
Scanner flagged 'weak cryptographic algorithm' at several lines, but there is no cryptographic functionality in this skill. Likely a pattern matching artifact.
No cryptographic code or algorithms present in this document. This appears to be a false positive triggered by keyword matching.