Skills clean-code Audit History
🧹

Audit History

clean-code - 2 audits

Audit version 2

Latest Safe

Feb 25, 2026, 05:46 AM

Static analysis detected 29 potential issues (external commands, network patterns, weak cryptography, system reconnaissance), but all are FALSE POSITIVES. The findings match Markdown code block delimiters (backticks), documentation examples, and reference URLs in educational content. The skill contains no executable code, performs no file operations, makes no network requests, and is purely documentation about software engineering principles. Safe to publish.

1
Files scanned
95
Lines analyzed
0
findings
claude
Audited by
No security issues found

Audit version 1

Safe

Feb 10, 2026, 09:04 AM

Static findings pointed to command execution, cryptography, and reconnaissance, but the file contains only documentation text. The only URL is a source attribution link, not a network action. No security risks were confirmed.

1
Files scanned
95
Lines analyzed
4
findings
codex
Audited by
Low Risk Issues (4)
False positive: external command execution
No command execution exists; the lines are prose and inline examples. Confidence: 0.2. Confidence reasoning: Only backticked identifiers and text appear.
False positive: weak cryptography
No cryptographic algorithms are used; these lines are descriptive text. Confidence: 0.15. Confidence reasoning: No crypto APIs or hashes appear.
False positive: system reconnaissance
The cited lines describe naming and design guidance, not system inspection. Confidence: 0.2. Confidence reasoning: No commands or environment reads are present.
Informational: external URL reference
The URL is a source attribution link in metadata, not a runtime network request. Confidence: 0.35. Confidence reasoning: It appears only in the front matter.