Audit History
binary-analysis-patterns - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Aug 14, 2026, 10:29 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 6, 2026, 11:41 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 11:41 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 01:10 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v1 | Feb 25, 2026, 04:17 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Aug 14, 2026, 10:29 AM
All 44 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code and fenced examples in SKILL.md. No shell execution, prompt injection, data exfiltration, or other malicious intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (44)
Jul 6, 2026, 11:41 PM
The static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown code fences and inline assembly terms, not executable Ruby or shell backticks. The skill is documentation for static binary analysis and does not instruct the agent to run external commands. No prompt injection attempt was found in SKILL.md.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (44)
Jul 6, 2026, 11:41 PM
The static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown code fences and inline assembly terms, not executable Ruby or shell backticks. The skill is documentation for static binary analysis and does not instruct the agent to run external commands. No prompt injection attempt was found in SKILL.md.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (44)
Jun 30, 2026, 01:10 PM
Static analysis flagged many external command and weak cryptography patterns, but review found they are Markdown examples and keyword collisions, not executable skill behavior. No runnable scripts, network calls, filesystem access, credential access, or prompt injection attempts were found in SKILL.md. The skill is safe to publish as a documentation-only binary analysis reference.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (45)
Feb 25, 2026, 04:17 AM
All 47 static analysis findings are false positives. The detected patterns are Markdown code fence delimiters and assembly code examples in documentation. No executable code, external commands, or security risks present. This is purely educational content about binary analysis patterns.