Audit History
azure-storage-file-share-ts - 6 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v6 Latest | Aug 14, 2026, 09:21 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v5 | Jul 23, 2026, 08:56 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 02:02 PM | 4 confirmed | 9 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 5, 2026, 10:51 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 01:18 PM | 3 confirmed | 0 | External commandsNetwork accessFilesystem accessEnv variables |
| v1 | Feb 25, 2026, 03:27 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Aug 14, 2026, 09:21 AM
All 116 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences, TypeScript template literals, or documented Azure SDK inputs. SKILL.md contains no executable scripts, prompt injection, secret exfiltration, or unrelated network destinations.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (50)
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (3)
Jul 23, 2026, 08:56 PM
All 116 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting or expected Azure SDK examples. The file shows named environment variables, official Azure endpoints, and explicit local paths without hidden execution, credential disclosure, or unexpected external destinations. No prompt injection or other malicious intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (50)
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (3)
Jul 8, 2026, 02:02 PM
Most static command and network alerts are false positives from Markdown fences, TypeScript template literals, and Azure SDK endpoint examples. Real security-sensitive content remains around credential-bearing environment variables and local file reads used for Azure file upload workflows. No prompt injection attempt was found in SKILL.md.
Confirmed security concerns (4)
Capability review items (9)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (90)
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (3)
Jul 5, 2026, 10:51 PM
Reviewed SKILL.md and found no evidence of prompt injection or hidden malicious intent. Static findings are false positives from Markdown fences and expected SDK examples. The examples cover Azure endpoints, credential variables, and user-selected local file paths without hidden execution.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (90)
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (3)
Jun 30, 2026, 01:18 PM
Static analysis flagged many external command, network, filesystem, environment, sensitive, weak crypto, and heuristic findings. Review found these are Markdown code examples for the Azure Storage File Share SDK, with no executable helper scripts, no prompt injection text, and no evidence of credential exfiltration. The skill should publish with a medium warning because it teaches handling storage keys, SAS tokens, local file transfer, network operations, and destructive delete APIs.
Confirmed security concerns (3)
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (3)
🔑 Env variables (4)
Detected Patterns
Feb 25, 2026, 03:27 AM
Prompt-only documentation skill with no executable code. Contains TypeScript examples for Azure SDK usage. No security risks detected. All code examples are reference documentation demonstrating legitimate Azure Storage File Share operations.