Audit History
azure-storage-file-share-py - 6 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v6 Latest | Aug 14, 2026, 09:16 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v5 | Jul 23, 2026, 08:53 PM | 1 confirmed | 1 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 01:58 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 10:51 PM | 1 confirmed | 0 | External commands |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 01:15 PM | No confirmed findings | 2 | Network accessFilesystem access |
| v1 | Feb 25, 2026, 03:25 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Aug 14, 2026, 09:16 AM
All 51 static findings are false positives caused by documented code fences, Azure endpoint examples, expected file output, environment-based configuration, or descriptive prose. No malicious commands, unauthorized data transfer, prompt injection, or unsafe intent is evidenced in the supplied findings.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (45)
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
🔑 Env variables (2)
Jul 23, 2026, 08:53 PM
Review found 50 false positives caused by Markdown formatting, expected Azure endpoints, scoped environment access, and a streaming recommendation. The fixed local download path can overwrite data, and cloud deletion examples lack confirmation safeguards.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (45)
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
🔑 Env variables (2)
Jul 8, 2026, 01:58 PM
I found no evidence of malicious intent, prompt injection, or hidden executable payloads in SKILL.md. The static findings are false positives from Markdown code fences, placeholder Azure URLs, environment variable examples, and fixed local file examples. The skill is a documentation guide for Azure Storage File Share SDK usage.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (45)
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
🔑 Env variables (2)
Jul 6, 2026, 10:51 PM
Static findings are mostly false positives caused by Markdown code fences, Azure endpoint examples, environment variable references, and local download snippets. No prompt injection, hidden exfiltration, or unauthorized command execution was found. The main security concern is legitimate destructive Azure file share operations that need clear guardrails.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (45)
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
🔑 Env variables (2)
Jun 30, 2026, 01:15 PM
The static analyzer flagged many Markdown code fences as Ruby or shell execution, but SKILL.md contains documentation examples and no executable wrapper code. The real risks are normal for an Azure storage guide: examples reference Azure endpoints, environment-based credentials, and local file reads or writes. No prompt injection attempt, credential exfiltration, obfuscation, or confirmed malicious intent was found.
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (2)
🔑 Env variables (2)
Feb 25, 2026, 03:25 AM
This skill is a documentation guide for Azure Storage File Share SDK for Python. Static analysis scanned 0 files with 0 risk patterns detected. The skill uses standard Azure SDK patterns with proper credential handling via environment variables and DefaultAzureCredential. No malicious patterns, command injection risks, or prompt injection attempts were found.