Audit History

All 38 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences, inline method names, placeholder Azure endpoints, and a standard environment-variable credential lookup. The examples contain no executable backtick expressions, suspicious destinations, or environment-variable exfiltration. One separate medium-risk issue remains because the token-generation example prints a client access URL that can expose its bearer credential.

The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences, inline method names, placeholder Azure endpoints, and a standard environment-variable credential example. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or executable command logic was found in SKILL.md.

The static external command findings are Markdown code fence and inline method formatting false positives. The Azure endpoint findings are placeholder documentation URLs, and the environment access example uses a standard secret-loading pattern. One semantic issue remains: the sample prints a generated client access URL that may expose WebSocket access tokens in logs.

Static analysis reported command execution, network, environment access, weak cryptography, and a critical heuristic combination. Manual review found these are Markdown installation commands, SDK examples, placeholder Azure endpoints, and environment-variable credential examples, not hidden executable skill logic. No prompt injection, malicious network exfiltration, or confirmed weak cryptographic implementation was found.

This is a documentation-only skill providing usage examples for the Azure Web PubSub Service SDK. No executable code is present. The skill references network operations and environment variable access as part of legitimate Azure SDK usage patterns. Static analysis found no security issues. The skill is safe to publish.