Audit History
algolia-search - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Jul 23, 2026, 07:01 PM | 1 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 08:01 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commandsNetwork accessEnv variables |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 07:58 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 10:55 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Feb 24, 2026, 05:20 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 23, 2026, 07:01 PM
All 61 static alerts are false positives caused by JavaScript templates, documentation links, expected credential configuration, and search terminology. One medium-risk semantic issue remains: the secured-key example inserts a user identifier into an authorization filter without validation or escaping. No prompt injection, malware, credential exfiltration, keylogging, or reconnaissance intent was found.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (4)
🌐 Network access (15)
🔑 Env variables (26)
Jul 8, 2026, 08:01 AM
All static findings were reviewed in context. The command, network, environment, sensitive, and blocker detections are false positives from documentation links, non-executable examples, and search-domain text. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found in SKILL.md.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (4)
🌐 Network access (15)
🔑 Env variables (26)
Jul 6, 2026, 07:58 PM
The single static finding is a false positive. The flagged line is Algolia performance guidance about avoiding deleteBy, not system reconnaissance or host discovery.
Jun 30, 2026, 10:55 AM
Static analysis flagged line 3 for a weak cryptographic algorithm and line 52 for system reconnaissance. Both are false positives: line 3 is a search product description, and line 52 warns against an expensive Algolia delete operation. No prompt injection, malicious intent, or data exfiltration evidence was found.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Feb 24, 2026, 05:20 PM
Static analysis flagged 3 patterns as potential security issues, but all are false positives. The flagged lines contain documentation text about Algolia search implementation, not executable code. Line 3 and 70 contain descriptive text misidentified as weak crypto. Line 53 discusses Algolia indexing best practices, not system reconnaissance. This is a documentation-only skill file with no security risks.