Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-BFA35559

6/30/2026, 10:46:27 AM

ai-ml security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
ai-ml
Version
v2
Maintainer
sickn33
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 254 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported many external command and weak cryptography patterns, but review found Markdown workflow text rather than executable code. The flagged backticks are inline skill names or fenced copy-paste prompts, and no shell execution, cryptographic implementation, reconnaissance command, prompt injection, network access, or data exfiltration was found. Residual risk is low because the workflow delegates work to other skills whose contents are outside this file.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 254 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Needs review findings (1)
REVIEW-001 Low
Workflow delegates to external skills
The workflow instructs users to invoke many other skills. This is expected for a workflow bundle, but the safety of those separate skills is not proven by this file.
The delegation pattern is explicit and benign in this file, but downstream skill behavior cannot be evaluated from this single Markdown document.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (3)
Low
Static external command findings are false positives
The static analyzer flagged Markdown backticks and fenced prompt examples as Ruby or shell execution. The cited lines contain skill names and natural-language prompts, not executable commands or command interpolation.
The reviewed file is Markdown only, and the cited spans show lists or fenced prompt text. There is no script block, shell command, Ruby syntax, or user input execution path.
Low
Static weak cryptography findings are false positives
The analyzer flagged AI and ML workflow language as weak cryptography indicators. The cited lines describe project phases, architecture, RAG, and workflow metadata, with no hashing, encryption, or cryptographic API usage.
Manual review found no cryptographic algorithm names used as implementation guidance. The flagged locations are headings, descriptions, and workflow actions.
Low
Static system reconnaissance finding is a false positive
The analyzer flagged a skill name related to hybrid search as reconnaissance. The line is a recommendation to invoke a search implementation skill, not a command that enumerates host or network state.
Line 90 is a Markdown list entry naming a related skill. It does not contain host inspection, network scanning, filesystem probing, or executable syntax.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable