Audit History
ai-agents-architect - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Jul 23, 2026, 08:38 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 07:37 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 6, 2026, 08:46 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 10:42 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands |
| v1 | Feb 24, 2026, 04:57 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 23, 2026, 08:38 PM
Both static findings are false positives caused by ordinary prose and inline Markdown identifiers. The skill contains architectural guidance without executable commands, network reconnaissance, or semantic threats.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jul 8, 2026, 07:37 AM
The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown text, not executable behavior. I found no evidence of command execution, network reconnaissance, prompt injection, or malicious intent in SKILL.md.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jul 6, 2026, 08:46 PM
All seven static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences or inline code formatting in SKILL.md. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, executable command path, or semantic abuse was found in the reviewed skill text.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (7)
Jun 30, 2026, 10:42 AM
Static command execution findings are false positives from markdown code fences and inline backticks in documentation. Static weak cryptography findings are false positives from ordinary prose about agent design, with no cryptographic APIs or executable code found. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, filesystem access, network access, or malicious intent.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Feb 24, 2026, 04:57 PM
AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.