Audit History

All 32 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around skill names and fenced text examples in SKILL.md. The file contains workflow guidance only, with no executable Ruby, shell commands, prompt injection, or other semantic security concern.

All 32 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around skill names or fenced prompt examples in SKILL.md. I found no executable code, shell command invocation, network access, credential handling, or prompt injection language in the reviewed file.

All static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code markers and fenced text blocks in SKILL.md. No executable shell commands, Ruby backtick execution, prompt injection attempts, or data exfiltration intent were found in the reviewed file.

Static analysis flagged Markdown backticks as Ruby shell execution and ordinary workflow words as weak cryptography indicators. Manual review found no executable scripts, shell commands, network access, credential handling, prompt injection, or data exfiltration behavior in SKILL.md.

Static analysis flagged 42 potential issues (32 external_commands, 10 weak_crypto). After evaluation, all findings are FALSE POSITIVES. The external_commands detections are markdown backticks used for skill references (e.g., `ai-agents-architect`), not shell execution. The weak_crypto detections are keyword false positives on common words like 'design', 'memory', 'tool'. This is a documentation-only skill with no executable code.