📦

Audit History

agent-orchestration-improve-agent - 5 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v5 LatestJul 23, 2026, 08:23 PM 2 confirmed0No capability change
v4 Jul 8, 2026, 07:16 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jul 6, 2026, 08:33 PM No confirmed findings0External commands
v2 Jun 30, 2026, 11:32 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Feb 24, 2026, 04:37 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 23, 2026, 08:23 PM

All 20 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences or benign metric text, with no executable Ruby or shell commands present. The skill does introduce moderate privacy and disclosure risks by requesting historical interaction analysis and visible reasoning traces without handling safeguards.

1
Files scanned
358
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Medium
Sensitive Interaction Data Handling Is Undefined
The workflow requests historical agent data, corrections, retries, and user feedback without requiring authorization, minimization, redaction, or retention controls.
The cited section explicitly directs collection and analysis of historical user interaction signals. No privacy or data-handling safeguards appear in that workflow.
Medium
Internal Reasoning Disclosure
The skill asks for reasoning trace visibility, which can expose hidden reasoning, private context, system instructions, or sensitive operational details.
Line 111 explicitly requests visible reasoning traces for debugging. The skill provides no restriction to safe summaries or sanitized diagnostics.
Audited by: codex

Jul 8, 2026, 07:16 AM

The static external command detections are false positives caused by Markdown code fences and workflow examples, not executable Ruby or shell. The blocker detections cite ordinary guidance about regression testing and evaluation metrics. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or executable security risk was found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
358
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 6, 2026, 08:33 PM

Static findings were reviewed against SKILL.md and are false positives from Markdown code fences or metric prose. No executable scripts, network reconnaissance instructions, prompt injection attempts, or data exfiltration intent were found.

1
Files scanned
350
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 11:32 AM

Static analysis reported external command, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance patterns, but review found no executable code or malicious instruction. The command hits are Markdown fences and workflow examples in SKILL.md, while the other hits are ordinary prose in the same file. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, credential access, or network behavior was found.

1
Files scanned
350
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex

Feb 24, 2026, 04:37 PM

All 24 static findings are false positives. The skill is documentation providing guidance on AI agent optimization methodology. Detected 'external commands' are markdown tool references, not actual shell execution. Detected 'cryptographic algorithms' are plain text describing performance improvements. No actual security risks present.

1
Files scanned
352
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude