Skills code-reviewer Audit History
📦

Audit History

code-reviewer - 3 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v3 LatestJul 9, 2026, 08:31 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jul 9, 2026, 08:31 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jul 7, 2026, 02:10 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 9, 2026, 08:31 AM

Static analysis flagged scripts, network calls, command execution, and keylogger terms, but review found they are educational examples inside code review guidance. No evidence found of active execution, data exfiltration, prompt injection, or malicious intent in the skill files.

8
Files scanned
1,474
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 9, 2026, 08:31 AM

Static analysis flagged scripts, network calls, command execution, and keylogger terms, but review found they are educational examples inside code review guidance. No evidence found of active execution, data exfiltration, prompt injection, or malicious intent in the skill files.

8
Files scanned
1,474
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 02:10 AM

All 78 static findings were assessed as false positives because they occur in Markdown guidance or educational code examples. No prompt injection, executable install hooks, or hidden data-exfiltration intent was found in the reviewed files. The skill is a documentation-only review guide with intentionally vulnerable examples for education.

8
Files scanned
1,573
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
1
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Critical
Keylogger keywords
- Credential theft (keylogging, form hijacking)
Force-confirmed blocker/critical static finding; AI dismissal overridden.
Audited by: codex