The single static finding is a false positive: the backticks enclose a DOT diagram, not a shell or Ruby command. The reviewed skill is prompt-only and contains no evidence of execution, data collection, or prompt injection.
The single static finding is a false positive from a fenced Graphviz diagram in SKILL.md lines 17-30. No executable code, shell instruction, prompt injection, or malicious intent was found in the reviewed files.
Manual review found no confirmed security issue. The external command alert is a fenced DOT diagram, and the weak cryptography alerts are prose false positives with no cryptographic code.
3
Files scanned
53
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
2
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The static analyzer flagged Ruby or shell backtick execution, but SKILL.md lines 17-30 are a fenced DOT diagram. No command is executed.
The flagged content is inside a markdown code fence labeled dot and only defines graph nodes and edges. No shell, Ruby, script, or executable file is present.
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. Static weak cryptography alerts matched ordinary planning prose in SKILL.md. No hashing, encryption, random generation, or security-sensitive algorithm appears.
Manual review found only instructional text about brainstorming and design decisions. The empty auxiliary files contain no code, so there is no cryptographic implementation to evaluate.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Security audit completed. Static findings are false positives: (1) Backticks at SKILL.md:17 are DOT diagram syntax for Graphviz, not shell commands. (2) No cryptographic code exists - the 'weak algorithm' findings are spurious pattern matches. This is a pure documentation skill with no code execution, network access, or sensitive operations.
Static scanner reported 'weak cryptographic algorithm' at multiple lines but no cryptographic code exists in this skill. Pattern matching false positive.
Manual review confirms no cryptographic algorithms, encoding functions, or security-sensitive operations. This is purely documentation content.
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Backticks at SKILL.md:17 flagged as 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' but are actually DOT graphviz diagram syntax for visualizing the process flow. No shell execution present.
The flagged code is a DOT diagram definition inside markdown code fences, not shell execution. This is documentation for visualizing the brainstorming process flow.