reply
Reply to p11 Review Threads
Review threads can stall when questions, unclear requests, or conflicting comments lack an answer. This skill inspects visible p11 comments and posts concise replies through the p11 CLI.
Stop for confirmation before installing.
Review the plan and obtain explicit user consent before changing files.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "reply" from https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/rarexlabs-reply/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "reply". A reviewer asks whether the launch date should be final or marked tentative.
Expected outcome:
Posted a concise reply asking for the final launch date decision and noting that revision can proceed after confirmation.
Using "reply". Several visible comments request direct wording changes.
Expected outcome:
No replies were needed. The comments contain settled edits that should be handled through the revision workflow.
Using "reply". Two reviewers give conflicting guidance on the same section.
Expected outcome:
Posted a reply that names the conflict and asks which direction should control the next revision.
Security Audit
High RiskSeveral static hits are Markdown formatting or safe option references, but the skill does instruct agents to run the p11 CLI, read history or comments, and post replies. The highest concern is automatic installation or npx execution of @p11-core/cli@latest, plus publishing reviewer-visible replies without an explicit confirmation step.
Confirmed security concerns (2)
Capability review items (8)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply/audits/4?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/rarexlabs-reply/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/rarexlabs-reply.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
rarexlabs. (2026). reply security audit report (audit version 4) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply/audits/4BibTeX citation
@techreport{rarexlabs-rarexlabs-reply-2026,
author = {rarexlabs},
title = {reply security audit report (audit version 4)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {4},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply/audits/4},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "reply security audit report (audit version 4)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "rarexlabs"
date-released: "2026-07-05"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/rarexlabs-reply/audits/4"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:rarexlabs-reply:audit:4"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: MediumWhat You Can Build
Answer Reviewer Questions
Review visible p11 comments and respond when reviewers need direct answers or missing context.
Clarify Open Decisions
Find indecisive or conflicting threads and post a concise question or decision prompt.
Triage Before Revision
Separate threads that need replies from settled requests that should move to revision work.
Try These Prompts
Use p11:reply on this p11 read URL and reply only to visible threads that need an answer: <url>
Use p11:reply for the most recent p11 document in this chat. Summarize threads that do not need replies.
Use p11:reply to find comments with unclear requests. Ask one direct clarifying question for each thread that blocks revision.
Use p11:reply on this target, draft each proposed reply first, and wait for my approval before posting: <target>
Best Practices
- Provide a p11 read URL or ID when possible.
- Review proposed replies before posting when comments involve policy, legal, or customer commitments.
- Use concise reply text that answers the thread and names any needed decision.
Avoid
- Using p11 history when the current chat already has a clear target.
- Replying to every unresolved thread without checking whether it needs a response.
- Posting replies for settled edit requests that should be handled by p11:revise.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Does it edit the document?
Can it use an edit URL?
Will it reply to resolved or hidden comments?
Does it need the p11 CLI?
Should I approve replies before posting?
Developer Details
Author
rarexlabsLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
62e2a730c5cd74eab4c7164309d810de660fcea3
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
0 downloads · 0 views
File structure