Skills delight Audit History
📦

Audit History

delight - 4 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v4 LatestJul 6, 2026, 08:10 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jul 6, 2026, 08:10 PM No confirmed findings0External commands
v2 Jun 30, 2026, 11:14 AM 2 confirmed0No capability change
v1 Mar 16, 2026, 08:32 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 6, 2026, 08:10 PM

All eleven static findings are false positives caused by markdown code fences and ordinary design copy in SKILL.md. The CSS examples, copy examples, and checklist text do not execute commands, inspect the system, or request sensitive data. No semantic security issues or prompt injection attempts were found.

1
Files scanned
307
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 6, 2026, 08:10 PM

All eleven static findings are false positives caused by markdown code fences and ordinary design copy in SKILL.md. The CSS examples, copy examples, and checklist text do not execute commands, inspect the system, or request sensitive data. No semantic security issues or prompt injection attempts were found.

1
Files scanned
307
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jun 30, 2026, 11:14 AM

Static analysis reported external command, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance indicators, but review found only Markdown examples and design guidance in SKILL.md. No executable shell code, cryptographic implementation, system probing, network access, credential handling, or prompt injection attempt was found.

1
Files scanned
307
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Low
Static External Command Matches Are Fenced Examples
The flagged locations are Markdown code fences, CSS snippets, and quoted UI copy examples. They do not execute Ruby, shell commands, or any external process.
The reviewed lines are fenced Markdown examples or literal product copy. There is no interpreter directive, command runner, subprocess call, or data flow from user input.
Low
Static Keyword Matches Are Descriptive Text
The weak cryptography and reconnaissance hits are false positives from normal prose, headings, and interface guidance. No cryptographic API, hash function, scan command, or host inspection behavior appears at these locations.
The surrounding context is UX guidance about delight, sound design, validation, and loading copy. No evidence of cryptography, system reconnaissance, or malicious intent was found.
Audited by: codex

Mar 16, 2026, 08:32 AM

All static analysis findings are false positives. The file contains CSS code examples and copy writing guidance for UI design, not executable code. Backticks in the file denote markdown code blocks for CSS and text examples, not shell command execution. No cryptographic functions, system calls, or network operations are present. This is a design guideline document safe for publication.

1
Files scanned
307
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude