Skills clarify
📦

clarify

Safe

Improve unclear UX copy and error messages

Confusing interface text frustrates users and increases support costs. This skill transforms jargon, ambiguous labels, and poor error messages into clear, human-friendly copy that guides users effectively.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 72 Bronze
1

Download the skill ZIP

2

Upload in Claude

Go to Settings → Capabilities → Skills → Upload skill

3

Toggle on and start using

Test it

Using "clarify". Error message: 'Invalid input. Validation failed.'

Expected outcome:

Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: name@example.com

Using "clarify". Empty state: 'No items found'

Expected outcome:

No projects yet. Click 'New Project' to create your first one and get started.

Using "clarify". Confirmation dialog: 'Are you sure?' with 'Yes/No' buttons

Expected outcome:

Delete 'Project Alpha'? This action cannot be undone. All associated files and data will be permanently removed.

Security Audit

Safe
v1 • 3/16/2026

All static analysis findings are false positives. The 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' detections (9 instances) and 'System reconnaissance' pattern (1 instance) were triggered by UX writing examples and documentation text, not actual code. This skill contains only instructional content for improving interface copy and poses no security risk.

1
Files scanned
187
Lines analyzed
0
findings
1
Total audits
No security issues found
Audited by: claude

Quality Score

38
Architecture
100
Maintainability
87
Content
35
Community
100
Security
91
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Fix confusing error messages

Transform technical error codes and vague messages into helpful explanations that tell users what went wrong and how to fix it.

Refine form labels and instructions

Replace generic placeholders like 'Enter value' with specific, actionable labels that reduce form abandonment.

Polish microcopy across UI

Review and improve button text, tooltips, empty states, and navigation labels for consistency and clarity.

Try These Prompts

Basic error message improvement
Review this error message and rewrite it to be clearer for non-technical users: 'Error 403: Forbidden - Access denied'
Form field audit
Analyze all form labels and help text on this signup page. Identify any jargon, ambiguity, or missing context. Suggest specific improvements for each field.
Button and CTA optimization
Replace generic button labels like 'Submit' and 'OK' with specific action-oriented text that matches user intent for this checkout flow.
Full UX copy style guide
Create a copy style guide for our product including: tone principles, terminology glossary, error message patterns, and examples of before/after improvements for common UI elements.

Best Practices

  • Always explain what went wrong and how to fix it in error messages
  • Use specific, descriptive labels instead of generic placeholders
  • Match button text to the action outcome users expect

Avoid

  • Using technical error codes without plain language explanation
  • Blaming users for errors with phrases like 'You entered an invalid...'
  • Generic button labels like 'Submit', 'OK', or 'Click here'

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of copy can this skill improve?
Error messages, form labels, button text, tooltips, empty states, success messages, loading states, confirmation dialogs, and navigation labels.
Does this skill work for technical products?
Yes. It adapts language to your audience's technical level, explaining necessary jargon while maintaining precision for expert users.
Can it help with brand voice consistency?
Yes. Provide your brand voice guidelines and the skill will ensure all copy improvements align with your tone and terminology.
What if I don't have existing copy to improve?
The skill can generate new copy from scratch based on your product context, user audience, and the specific UI component needs.
Does this work for non-English interfaces?
The skill works best with English copy. For other languages, it can provide principles and patterns that translate well.
How do I know if the improved copy is better?
Test for comprehension (can users understand without context), actionability (do users know what to do), and consistency (terminology matches elsewhere).

Developer Details

File structure

📄 SKILL.md