Audit History

The static alerts are false positives caused by markdown backticks, fenced examples, and headings. The reviewed files provide planning workflow guidance and do not contain executable code, prompt injection attempts, credential access, or data exfiltration behavior.

The static alerts are false positives caused by markdown backticks, fenced examples, and headings. The reviewed files provide planning workflow guidance and do not contain executable code, prompt injection attempts, credential access, or data exfiltration behavior.

Static analysis reported many external command, weak crypto, browser storage, URL, and dangerous-combination patterns. Review found these are markdown examples, inline filenames, and one documentation link, not executable code or data exfiltration. The only confirmed concern is intentional filesystem use to create and update planning files, so publication is safe with a low-risk label.

Documentation-only skill describing workflow patterns. No executable code, network calls, or credential access. All 68 static findings are false positives: Claude tool examples were misidentified as shell commands, and common words triggered incorrect cryptographic warnings.

Documentation-only skill describing workflow patterns. No executable code, network calls, or credential access. All 68 static findings are false positives: Claude tool examples were misidentified as shell commands, and common words triggered incorrect cryptographic warnings.

This is a documentation-only skill with no executable code. It provides workflow patterns for using markdown files to manage complex tasks. No security risks identified.

This is a documentation-only skill with no executable code. It provides workflow patterns for using markdown files to manage complex tasks. No security risks identified.