# Improve Dutch Copy with Natural Rewriting

Dutch business copy can sound stiff when it repeats formal transitions and passive constructions. This guide helps an AI agent identify those patterns and suggest natural Dutch or Belgian Dutch rewrites.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add nexaiguy/nl-humanizer-ai-smell-detector
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: nexaiguy-nl-humanizer-ai-smell-detector
- Version: 1.2
- Author version: 1.2
- Skillstore revision: r1
- Version status: invalid
- Tree hash: 14481f0fffe1c596009eff6b6debeb95794771c420a98437feccccd4ae99b39f
- Author: nexaiguy
- GitHub username: nexaiguy
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/nexaiguy/nex-ai-skills/tree/463aaff26593654193deb52f24d18e80ec21e323/skills/nl-humanizer-ai-smell-detector
- Ref: 3ddfdca559084abffbfdd188f2ba14b597dcfd9c
- Supported tools: Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: allowed
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: network
- Quality score: 77
- Quality tier: bronze
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/nexaiguy-nl-humanizer-ai-smell-detector
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/nexaiguy-nl-humanizer-ai-smell-detector/manifest

## Capabilities

- Guide an agent to identify formal transitions, passive constructions, and repetitive three-part structures in Dutch text.
- Request a 0-5 style rating with explanations of the linguistic signals behind it.
- Suggest shorter sentences and active phrasing while aiming to preserve the original intent.
- Guide rewrites toward standard Dutch or conversational Belgian Dutch.
- Review Dutch business and web copy for repetitive wording and generic filler.

## Use Cases

- Edit Dutch campaign copy: Identify filler and repetitive sentence patterns, then request a clearer version that preserves the campaign message.
- Adapt copy for Belgian readers: Convert formal Netherlands Dutch into conversational Belgian Dutch while retaining product names and factual claims.
- Review website language: Ask an agent to flag passive voice and formal transitions in service descriptions before editorial approval.

## Prompt Templates

### Identify style signals

```
Review this Dutch text for formal filler and repetitive patterns: [text]. Give a 0-5 style rating and list supporting phrases.
```

### Rewrite in standard Dutch

```
Rewrite this text in natural standard Dutch: [text]. Shorten sentences and use active voice. Preserve facts and show the main changes.
```

### Localize for Belgian readers

```
Adapt this copy into conversational Belgian Dutch for [audience]: [text]. Preserve product names, prices, and claims. Explain the main register changes.
```

### Audit and compare multiple passages

```
Audit these Dutch passages: [passages]. Rate each from 0-5 with cited signals. Rewrite for [audience] in [register]. Preserve facts and flag uncertain edits.
```

## Limitations

- The package contains only a Markdown guide; scripts, extension source, templates, and an executable scoring engine are not included.
- The guide does not define a complete scoring formula or provide validated AI authorship detection.
- Linguistic review does not verify factual accuracy; rewritten claims require human review.
- Creative literature may receive misleading style flags, and output quality depends on the host agent.

## Best Practices

- Specify the intended audience, Dutch variant, and formality level before requesting a rewrite.
- Ask for cited phrases behind each style rating and treat the number as an editorial estimate.
- Compare the rewrite with the original to verify facts, promises, and terminology before publication.

## Anti Patterns

- Treating a style rating as proof that a person or AI wrote the text.
- Removing every formal expression without considering audience, genre, or required terminology.
- Publishing rewrites without checking for changed claims or unsupported additions.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-11-02T12:24:48.489\+00:00
- Summary: All three static findings are false positives: the URLs provide attribution and catalog references, and the footer contains no system reconnaissance instructions. No evidence found of executable commands, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed SKILL.md.

## Stats

- Views: 0
- Downloads: 0
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0