# Assess Belgian Public Tenders

Belgian tender documents can make eligibility checks and bidding priorities difficult to assess. This guide structures eligibility requirements, weighted award criteria, and a preliminary bidding recommendation.

## Install

```bash
npx skillstore add nexaiguy/nex-overheidsopdrachten-tender
```

## Metadata

- Status: approved
- Slug: nexaiguy-nex-overheidsopdrachten-tender
- Version: 1.0
- Author version: 1.0
- Skillstore revision: r1
- Version status: invalid
- Tree hash: 20c820c7523e03add08b395b4b79abcdbc9d7041305204f64deae944077a49d0
- Author: nexaiguy
- GitHub username: nexaiguy
- License: MIT
- Repository: https://github.com/nexaiguy/nex-ai-skills/tree/463aaff26593654193deb52f24d18e80ec21e323/skills/nex-overheidsopdrachten-tender
- Ref: 3ddfdca559084abffbfdd188f2ba14b597dcfd9c
- Supported tools: Claude, Codex, Claude Code
- Audit status: complete
- Agent install advisory: allowed
- Manual install advisory: allowed
- Artifact signature: available
- Audit attestation: unavailable
- Human verification: not\_verified
- Risk factors: network
- Quality score: 78
- Quality tier: bronze
- Public page: https://skillstore.pages.dev/skills/nexaiguy-nex-overheidsopdrachten-tender
- Manifest: https://skillstore.pages.dev/api/skills/nexaiguy-nex-overheidsopdrachten-tender/manifest

## Capabilities

- Guide extraction of exclusion grounds, selection requirements, and mandatory eligibility conditions from supplied tender documents.
- Organize award criteria and their percentage weights for bid planning.
- Structure a preliminary go or no-go assessment for the procurement file.
- Guide comparison of estimated contract value with applicable procurement thresholds and procedures.
- Prepare a working assessment for review by a legal adviser or procurement specialist.

## Use Cases

- Screen a potential bid: Compare tender eligibility requirements with company evidence before committing proposal resources.
- Prioritize proposal effort: Organize weighted award criteria and identify where the proposal needs stronger supporting evidence.
- Prepare a review dossier: Collect eligibility gaps, procedure questions, and unresolved threshold checks for professional review.

## Prompt Templates

### Summarize eligibility

```
Review this Belgian tender: [text]. List mandatory eligibility conditions, exclusion grounds, and missing information. Do not assume company compliance.
```

### Map award criteria

```
Extract award criteria and weights from [tender text]. Identify proposal priorities and cite supporting sections. Mark missing weights as unknown.
```

### Assess bidding readiness

```
Compare [tender requirements] with [company evidence]. Give a provisional go or no-go recommendation, evidence gaps, and questions for legal review.
```

### Review procedure and thresholds

```
Review [tender] using [contract value], [contract type], and [dated official threshold source]. Assess eligibility, procedure, award weights, and uncertainties. Separate evidence from assumptions.
```

## Limitations

- Covers Belgian public procurement in classical sectors, not foreign tenders or special sectors such as water and energy.
- Produces working documents, not legal advice or an authoritative eligibility decision.
- Claims updated 2026-2027 thresholds but includes no threshold table, official citations, or automatic update mechanism.
- Contains only a public guide; original package scripts, extension source, and templates are not included.

## Best Practices

- Provide complete tender documents and verified company evidence; identify missing attachments before assessing eligibility.
- Verify thresholds against dated official sources for the contract type and relevant procurement period.
- Have a qualified reviewer confirm eligibility, procedural conclusions, and unresolved legal questions before submission.

## Anti Patterns

- Treating the preliminary recommendation as legal advice or an official eligibility ruling.
- Assuming the guide contains a verified current threshold database or automatic procurement portal integration.
- Declaring compliance without evidence for every mandatory requirement.

## Security Audit

- Audited at: 2026-11-02T11:56:11.163\+00:00
- Summary: All four static findings are false positives: the URLs are attribution links, and the reconnaissance matches contain procurement criteria or promotional text. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, exfiltration, or executable commands in the reviewed guide. The guide claims current procurement thresholds but supplies no threshold table or update mechanism.

## Stats

- Views: 0
- Downloads: 0
- Favorites: 0
- Popularity score: 0