Audit History
azure-kubernetes - 5 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v5 Latest | Jul 23, 2026, 06:47 PM | 2 confirmed | 2 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jul 8, 2026, 09:10 AM | 7 confirmed | 13 | Env variablesFilesystem access |
| v3 | Jul 5, 2026, 10:20 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jun 30, 2026, 08:29 AM | 1 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Mar 28, 2026, 08:19 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 23, 2026, 06:47 PM
Most scanner hits are Markdown formatting, Kubernetes field names, official links, or fixed examples. Two predictable /tmp exports create disclosure and clobber risks. Mandatory-authority language and missing approval gates require remediation before publication.
Confirmed security concerns (2)
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
🔑 Env variables (5)
⚙️ External commands (50)
🌐 Network access (8)
Jul 8, 2026, 09:10 AM
Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, Kubernetes field names, documentation URLs, and safety examples. Confirmed risks relate to Azure CLI or MCP actions against live cloud resources, AKS credential permissions, temporary export of cluster manifests, and RBAC grant guidance. No prompt injection attempt was found in the reviewed files.
Confirmed security concerns (7)
Capability review items (13)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
🔑 Env variables (5)
⚙️ External commands (81)
🌐 Network access (8)
Detected Patterns
Jul 5, 2026, 10:20 PM
All static command and reconnaissance detections are false positives caused by Markdown examples, Azure CLI placeholders, and AKS troubleshooting guidance. I found no prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, or unauthorized network behavior; the only URL is a Microsoft Learn documentation link.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (10)
🌐 Network access (1)
Jun 30, 2026, 08:29 AM
Static analysis flagged many shell-command and weak-cryptography patterns, but review found the command hits are documented Azure CLI and kubectl examples for legitimate AKS administration. The weak-cryptography alerts are false positives from ordinary words and AKS terminology, with no evidence of cryptographic code, malware, data exfiltration, or prompt-injection instructions that target the evaluator.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (10)
🌐 Network access (1)
Detected Patterns
Mar 28, 2026, 08:19 AM
Security audit completed. All static findings were evaluated as false positives. The skill is official Microsoft Azure documentation providing AKS cluster planning guidance. No malicious patterns, credential handling, or prompt injection detected.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.