Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-68B6338A

6/30/2026, 7:59:55 AM

azure-aigateway security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
azure-aigateway
Version
v2
Maintainer
microsoft
Source
github.com/microsoft/github-copilot-for-azure/tree/main/plugin/skills/azure-aigateway/
Coverage
5 Files scanned · 871 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis flagged many command, network, weak-crypto, and jailbreak-keyword patterns, but review found they are documentation examples for Azure API Management, policy snippets, SDK notes, and content-safety configuration. No hidden execution path, data exfiltration behavior, malicious prompt injection, or credential harvesting was found. The residual risk is low because users may copy cloud provisioning commands that affect Azure resources and costs.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

5 Files scanned · 871 Lines analyzed

0 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 6 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Observed in 1 evidence location

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 8 evidence locations

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (4)
Low
SKILL.md:81-89SKILL.md:292-309SKILL.md:337-350SKILL.md:645-656
Documented Azure CLI and curl examples require user care
The external command findings are false positives for hidden execution. They appear in fenced examples for Azure CLI, package installation, and endpoint testing. The low residual risk is that users may copy commands that create Azure resources, assign roles, or call APIM endpoints.
The commands are inside Markdown code fences and are presented as deployment instructions. No file contains code that automatically executes these commands.
Low
SKILL.md:62-68SKILL.md:355-362SKILL.md:420-431SKILL.md:686-702
Public documentation and sample URLs are expected network references
The network findings are false positives for exfiltration. The URLs point to Microsoft Learn, Azure sample repositories, a public Azure REST API specification, and placeholder backend URLs used in import examples.
The reviewed URLs are documentation, sample, or placeholder references. I found no code that sends secrets or user data to an unauthorized endpoint.
Low
references/sdk/azure-mgmt-apimanagement-py.md:11-15
SDK environment access reads an Azure subscription identifier
The env_access finding is low risk. The Python SDK quick reference reads AZURE_SUBSCRIPTION_ID to construct an Azure management client, which is normal for Azure SDK usage and is not a secret by itself.
The environment variable is used only as a subscription identifier in a documented SDK client example. No network exfiltration or broad environment dumping was found.
Low
SKILL.md:176-205SKILL.md:723-732SKILL.md:1-6
Jailbreak and weak-crypto keyword hits are documentation terms
The critical jailbreak keyword and weak-cryptography findings are false positives. The skill discusses detecting jailbreak attempts with Azure content safety and uses terms like SHA or parameter types in normal documentation contexts, not bypass instructions or insecure cryptographic implementation.
The suspicious terms are used to describe protective content-safety policies and skill routing metadata. No prompt injection request, jailbreak procedure, or cryptographic code path was found.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable