Audit History

All nine static findings are false positives caused by ordinary financial prose, inline Markdown code, or a fenced file tree. No prompt injection, data-exfiltration intent, or other net-new semantic security issue was found.

All eight static findings are false positives caused by Markdown text, related-skill identifiers, or a fenced directory tree. No malicious command execution, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or other semantic security issue was found.

All eight static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The flagged lines are markdown documentation for financial-analysis rules, related skill names, or file layout, and no prompt-injection language was found.

The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown formatting, finance notation, and file-layout documentation. I found no prompt injection text or malicious intent in the reviewed skill files; the skill is a prompt-only research workflow that uses Longbridge data and source-tagging rules.

Static analysis reported many external-command and weak-crypto patterns. Manual review found no prompt-injection attempt or malicious code; weak-crypto hits are false positives, while Longbridge CLI execution and WebSearch fallback are intentional workflow features. Publish with a medium-risk warning because user-influenced market symbols are passed to local CLI commands and live searches.

All 176 static findings are false positives. This is a prompt-only markdown documentation skill with no executable code. The 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' findings (158 instances) are triggered by backtick characters in markdown code blocks containing CLI command examples (e.g. `longbridge quote <SYMBOL> --format json`), not actual code execution. The 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' findings (18 instances) are false matches on text patterns in documentation. The 'System reconnaissance' findings match on financial sector terms (banks/insurance/REITs), not system commands.