Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-5311E0EB

5/20/2026, 9:19:43 AM

brandkit security assessment v1

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: claude Historical report
Skill name
brandkit
Version
v1
Maintainer
leonxlnx
Source
github.com/leonxlnx/taste-skill/tree/main/skills/brandkit/
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 799 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

The static analyzer detected 31 potential issues, but all are false positives. The SKILL.md file is 100% markdown design guidance for AI image generation with no executable code. Backtick patterns flagged as external_commands are markdown formatting for layout dimensions (e.g., `3 x 3`) and letter examples. Weak cryptographic algorithm and system reconnaissance flags all point to design terminology, not actual security threats. No prompt injection, code execution, network requests, file system access, or environment variable access was found. The skill is safe to publish.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 799 Lines analyzed

0 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 11 evidence locations

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: claude

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (4)
Medium
SKILL.md:78SKILL.md:79SKILL.md:86-90SKILL.md:170-173
External Commands (False Positive - Markdown Backticks)
The static analyzer flagged 12 instances of Ruby/shell backtick execution. All flagged patterns are markdown inline code formatting for layout dimensions (e.g., `3 x 3`, `2 x 3`, `4:3`, `16:10` at lines 78-90) and letter examples (e.g., `K`, `N`, `S`, `A` at lines 170-173). No shell execution is occurring.
Medium
SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:8SKILL.md:32SKILL.md:339SKILL.md:694SKILL.md:702SKILL.md:705SKILL.md:711SKILL.md:784
Weak Cryptographic Algorithm (False Positive - No Crypto Code)
The static analyzer flagged 10 instances of weak cryptographic algorithms. All flagged lines contain design guidance text: file description (line 3), system prompt (line 8), visual quality guidance (line 32), visual mode headings (line 339), and anti-generic design rules (lines 694, 702, 705, 711, 784). No cryptographic code or algorithm references exist in the file.
Low
SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:80SKILL.md:111SKILL.md:119SKILL.md:354SKILL.md:404SKILL.md:715SKILL.md:750
System Reconnaissance (False Positive - Design Terminology)
The static analyzer flagged 8 instances of system reconnaissance patterns. All flagged lines contain brand strategy and design terminology: file description (line 3), layout guidance (line 80), brand strategy thinking steps (lines 111, 119), visual design cues (lines 354, 404), reference extraction guidance (line 715), and prompt template layout options (line 750). No actual reconnaissance commands or techniques are present.
Low
SKILL.md:272
Sensitive Data Reference (False Positive - No SAM Database)
The static analyzer flagged a Windows SAM database reference at line 272. Line 272 contains the markdown heading '# DEFAULT 3 x 3 PANEL SYSTEM'. No mention of SAM database, Windows registry, or any sensitive system file exists anywhere in the file.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable