Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-99655AC2

6/30/2026, 6:16:16 AM

component-refactoring security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
component-refactoring
Version
v2
Maintainer
langgenius
Source
github.com/langgenius/dify/tree/main/.agents/skills/component-refactoring/
Coverage
4 Files scanned · 1,774 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but review found they are Markdown examples, file names, or ordinary TypeScript identifiers. The only confirmed risk factor is legitimate external command guidance for pnpm scripts, which should be used only in trusted Dify repositories. No prompt injection, credential exfiltration, destructive command, or malicious intent was found.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

4 Files scanned · 1,774 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 5 evidence locations

Capability review items (1)
Low
SKILL.md:19-33SKILL.md:403-417
External Command Guidance Requires Trusted Repository Context
The skill tells users to run pnpm refactoring, analysis, lint, type-check, and test commands from the Dify web directory. These commands are normal for a coding skill, but they execute local package scripts and may modify files through lint fixes.
The command instructions are explicit and repeated, but they are documented workflow commands rather than hidden execution logic. The risk is low when used in a trusted repository with reviewed package scripts.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (1)
Low
references/hook-extraction.md:208-215references/component-splitting.md:62-66references/complexity-patterns.md:280-316
Static High-Severity Patterns Dismissed as False Positives
The weak cryptography, system reconnaissance, and sensitive file detections map to normal words such as key, mode, publish, and Object.keys in examples. No evidence found of cryptographic operations, reconnaissance commands, credential files, or secret handling.
Targeted review of representative flagged lines shows ordinary TypeScript examples and prose, not security-sensitive behavior. Searches did not find prompt injection, network exfiltration, environment access, or destructive shell commands.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable