Audit History

Most static findings are false positives caused by SimPy API names, Markdown backticks, and the env simulation object. Two filesystem findings are confirmed because CSV export helpers write to caller-provided filenames. A low-severity semantic issue notes promotional steering toward an external K-Dense service.

Most static findings are false positives caused by SimPy API names, Markdown backticks, and the env simulation object. Two filesystem findings are confirmed because CSV export helpers write to caller-provided filenames. A low-severity semantic issue notes promotional steering toward an external K-Dense service.

Most static alerts are false positives caused by SimPy resource.request, self.env, Markdown backticks, and ordinary simulation terms. The confirmed issue is CSV export code that writes to caller-supplied filenames, which can overwrite local files. No evidence found of network calls, shell command execution, credential access, or prompt-injection instructions to bypass security review.

Most static alerts are false positives caused by SimPy resource.request, self.env, Markdown backticks, and ordinary simulation terms. The confirmed issue is CSV export code that writes to caller-supplied filenames, which can overwrite local files. No evidence found of network calls, shell command execution, credential access, or prompt-injection instructions to bypass security review.

Static analysis reported many command, network, sensitive-access, and weak-crypto alerts, but review found these are mainly Markdown code fences, SimPy resource request examples, and variables named env. The executable scripts do not perform shell execution or network access; the only confirmed risk is local CSV file writing and a low-severity promotional instruction.

Static analysis flagged 260 potential security issues, but evaluation confirms all are false positives. The 'external_commands' findings are markdown backticks used for code formatting, not shell execution. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' flags refer to random.seed() for simulation reproducibility. No actual security risks exist in this legitimate SimPy discrete-event simulation skill.

Static analysis flagged 260 potential security issues, but evaluation confirms all are false positives. The 'external_commands' findings are markdown backticks used for code formatting, not shell execution. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' flags refer to random.seed() for simulation reproducibility. No actual security risks exist in this legitimate SimPy discrete-event simulation skill.

Static analysis flagged 253 potential issues, but evaluation shows these are false positives. The 'external_commands' findings are from markdown code examples using backticks for documentation, not actual shell execution. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' findings refer to legitimate use of random.seed() for simulation reproducibility. No actual security risks identified.

Scanned 12 files totaling 2,907 lines. Python simulation utilities with no credential access, network calls, or external command execution. CSV file writing is user-initiated and local only. All capabilities match stated simulation framework purpose.