Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-3A498E4D

6/30/2026, 5:42:03 AM

shap security assessment v5

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
shap
Version
v5
Maintainer
K-Dense-AI
Source
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills/tree/main/scientific-skills/shap
Coverage
5 Files scanned · 2,470 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported many external command and weak cryptography patterns, but review found they are Markdown syntax, Python SHAP examples, API names, and SHAP terminology. No prompt injection attempt, malicious intent, data exfiltration, or executable marketplace script was found. The only retained risk factor is benign external documentation links, so the skill is safe to publish with low risk.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

5 Files scanned · 2,470 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 1 evidence location

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Capability review items (1)
Low
SKILL.md:558-559
Benign Documentation URLs
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE with minor marketplace disclosure value. The hardcoded URLs point to SHAP official documentation and the SHAP GitHub repository. They are reference links, not automated network requests or data exfiltration endpoints.
The URLs are visible documentation links in a resources section. No code path sends user data to these destinations.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (2)
Low
SKILL.md:63-82references/explainers.md:60-76references/plots.md:40-53references/workflows.md:19-47
Markdown Backtick Static Analysis False Positive
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The reported Ruby or shell backtick execution appears in Markdown inline code and fenced Python examples for SHAP APIs. No executable skill script, shell interpolation, or user-controlled command execution was found in the reviewed context.
The flagged locations are documentation code fences or inline API names. They describe user-run Python SHAP examples and do not define executable marketplace code.
Low
SKILL.md:3SKILL.md:440-451references/explainers.md:3-7references/theory.md:81
Weak Cryptography Static Analysis False Positive
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The weak cryptography alerts match SHAP, Shapley, or mathematical notation in model explanation documentation. I found no MD5, SHA-1, DES, insecure random generation, or credential-handling code in the reviewed context.
The reviewed lines discuss SHAP and Shapley values, not cryptographic algorithms. The static pattern appears to have matched the SHAP name rather than security-sensitive code.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable