Audit History
scientific-visualization - 7 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v7 Latest | Jul 6, 2026, 06:55 PM | 2 confirmed | 1 | No capability change |
| v6 | Jul 6, 2026, 06:55 PM | 2 confirmed | 1 | Network accessExternal commands Contains scripts |
| v5 | Jun 30, 2026, 06:36 AM | 1 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v4 | Jan 17, 2026, 06:47 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jan 17, 2026, 06:47 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Contains scriptsFilesystem access Network accessExternal commands |
| v2 | Jan 12, 2026, 05:01 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Network accessExternal commands Contains scriptsFilesystem access |
| v1 | Jan 4, 2026, 04:55 PM | No confirmed findings | 1 | Baseline |
Jul 6, 2026, 06:55 PM
Most static findings are false positives from Markdown code fences, visualization terminology, dictionary keys, and citation URLs. One real local file-write capability remains in style_presets.py, and semantic review found an embedded safety self-assessment plus promotional steering. No evidence found of credential access, malicious command execution, or unauthorized network calls.
Confirmed security concerns (2)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
⚙️ External commands (130)
Jul 6, 2026, 06:55 PM
Most static findings are false positives from Markdown code fences, visualization terminology, dictionary keys, and citation URLs. One real local file-write capability remains in style_presets.py, and semantic review found an embedded safety self-assessment plus promotional steering. No evidence found of credential access, malicious command execution, or unauthorized network calls.
Confirmed security concerns (2)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
⚙️ External commands (130)
Jun 30, 2026, 06:36 AM
Manual review found no evidence of malicious intent, prompt injection, credential access, network execution, or command execution. The static critical and high findings are false positives caused by hex color values, Markdown code fences, documentation URLs, and words such as key in normal plotting context. The remaining real risk is expected local file output from figure export and style template helpers.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Static false positives ignored (4)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚡ Contains scripts (2)
📁 Filesystem access (2)
Jan 17, 2026, 06:47 AM
All 309 static findings are false positives. The scanner misidentifies hex color codes (#E69F00, etc.) as cryptographic hashes, markdown code blocks as shell execution, and configuration variables as certificate files. This is a legitimate scientific visualization library with matplotlib styling, color palettes, and figure export utilities. No actual security risks exist - the skill only manipulates local figure files and contains no network calls, external commands, or credential handling.
Risk Factors
⚡ Contains scripts (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jan 17, 2026, 06:47 AM
All 309 static findings are false positives. The scanner misidentifies hex color codes (#E69F00, etc.) as cryptographic hashes, markdown code blocks as shell execution, and configuration variables as certificate files. This is a legitimate scientific visualization library with matplotlib styling, color palettes, and figure export utilities. No actual security risks exist - the skill only manipulates local figure files and contains no network calls, external commands, or credential handling.
Risk Factors
⚡ Contains scripts (2)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
Jan 12, 2026, 05:01 PM
The static analysis findings are overwhelmingly false positives. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' alerts are triggered by color hex codes (e.g., #E69F00) being misidentified as hashes. The 'external commands' findings are code examples in documentation, not actual command execution. The 'certificate/key files' findings are also false positives - no actual cryptographic materials are present. This is a legitimate scientific visualization library with no security risks.
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (1)
⚙️ External commands (1)
Jan 4, 2026, 04:55 PM
This is a pure scientific visualization skill. It contains Python helper scripts that configure matplotlib settings and export figures to local files. No network calls, no credential access, no code execution hooks. The filesystem access is limited to saving user-specified figure outputs.
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.