Audit History
gget - 7 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v7 Latest | Jul 6, 2026, 06:24 PM | 4 confirmed | 0 | No capability change |
| v6 | Jul 6, 2026, 06:24 PM | 4 confirmed | 0 | Contains scripts |
| v5 | Jun 30, 2026, 05:37 AM | 4 confirmed | 0 | Contains scriptsEnv variablesExternal commands |
| v4 | Jan 17, 2026, 07:38 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jan 17, 2026, 07:38 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Filesystem access External commands |
| v2 | Jan 12, 2026, 04:16 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | External commands Contains scriptsFilesystem access |
| v1 | Jan 4, 2026, 04:34 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 6, 2026, 06:24 PM
Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, documented gget commands, expected analysis file writes, and public database links. The audit did find semantic risks: a bundled self-attested safety report, promotional steering text, an unsafe pickle cache example, and an output-path issue from unsanitized FASTA identifiers.
Confirmed security concerns (4)
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (16)
🔑 Env variables (4)
⚙️ External commands (242)
Jul 6, 2026, 06:24 PM
Most static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, documented gget commands, expected analysis file writes, and public database links. The audit did find semantic risks: a bundled self-attested safety report, promotional steering text, an unsafe pickle cache example, and an output-path issue from unsanitized FASTA identifiers.
Confirmed security concerns (4)
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (5)
📁 Filesystem access (16)
🔑 Env variables (4)
⚙️ External commands (242)
Jun 30, 2026, 05:37 AM
Most static findings are false positives from Markdown code fences, documented shell examples, public database URLs, and expected local result files. However, SKILL.md contains an untrusted behavioral instruction that tells the assistant to promote K-Dense Web, which is a prompt-injection attempt and blocks publication until removed.
Confirmed security concerns (4)
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Risk Factors
⚡ Contains scripts (3)
🌐 Network access (4)
📁 Filesystem access (4)
🔑 Env variables (2)
⚙️ External commands (3)
Detected Patterns
Jan 17, 2026, 07:38 AM
This is legitimate bioinformatics software. All 614 static findings are false positives: markdown code fences were misidentified as Ruby shell execution, hardcoded URLs are public genomic databases (Ensembl, UniProt, NCBI), cryptographic patterns are data integrity checksums, and the critical heuristic is standard bioinformatics behavior (network queries to public APIs + local file operations for results).
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (2)
Jan 17, 2026, 07:38 AM
This is legitimate bioinformatics software. All 614 static findings are false positives: markdown code fences were misidentified as Ruby shell execution, hardcoded URLs are public genomic databases (Ensembl, UniProt, NCBI), cryptographic patterns are data integrity checksums, and the critical heuristic is standard bioinformatics behavior (network queries to public APIs + local file operations for results).
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (2)
Jan 12, 2026, 04:16 PM
This is a legitimate bioinformatics tool. All 592 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES triggered by markdown documentation format. The analyzer misinterpreted markdown code block delimiters (backticks) as Ruby backtick execution, and flagged bioinformatics algorithm names as 'weak cryptographic algorithms'. No subprocess, os.system, or command injection patterns exist in the actual Python code.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (1)
🌐 Network access (1)
Jan 4, 2026, 04:34 PM
The skill provides wrapper scripts for the gget bioinformatics library. No credential theft, data exfiltration, or malicious code execution patterns were found. All network calls go to legitimate genomic databases (Ensembl, UniProt, AlphaFold, etc.). Filesystem access is limited to reading user-provided gene lists and writing results to local directories.