caveman-review
Write Concise Pull Request Review Comments
Pull request reviews often become too wordy for quick action. This skill formats feedback as concise, paste-ready comments with location, problem, and fix.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "caveman-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "caveman-review". Long comment about a missing guard before reading a user email on line 42.
Expected outcome:
Line 42: bug: user may be missing. Add a guard before reading the email field.
Using "caveman-review". Review note asking whether retry handling is needed after rate limits.
Expected outcome:
Line 23: risk: rate limits fail once. Add bounded retry handling.
Using "caveman-review". Draft feedback says one large function should be easier to read.
Expected outcome:
Lines 88-140: nit: function has four jobs. Extract validation, normalization, and persistence steps.
Security Audit
SafeAll static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code examples and normal review terminology in SKILL.md. The skill is prose-only guidance for formatting code review comments; no executable commands, network behavior, prompt injection, or data access intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (10)
🌐 Network access (1)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review/audits/4?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
juliusbrussee. (2026). caveman-review security audit report (audit version 4) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review/audits/4BibTeX citation
@techreport{juliusbrussee-juliusbrussee-caveman-review-2026,
author = {juliusbrussee},
title = {caveman-review security audit report (audit version 4)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {4},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review/audits/4},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "caveman-review security audit report (audit version 4)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "juliusbrussee"
date-released: "2026-07-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/juliusbrussee-caveman-review/audits/4"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:juliusbrussee-caveman-review:audit:4"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Condense PR Feedback
Convert long draft feedback into paste-ready comments that identify line, issue, and fix.
Focus Large Reviews
Keep review discussions focused during large diffs by separating bugs, risks, nits, and questions.
Reply to Contributors
Respond to contributor pull requests with concise comments while preserving useful guidance.
Try These Prompts
Review this diff with caveman-review. Return one-line comments with location, problem, and fix.
Rewrite my draft PR comments in caveman-review style. Keep facts, remove hedging, and preserve line references.
Review this multi-file diff. Prefix each item as bug, risk, nit, or question when helpful. Use file and line references.
Audit this security-sensitive change. Use normal paragraphs for serious security or architecture findings, then use terse comments for routine items.
Best Practices
- Provide the diff and enough surrounding context for accurate line references.
- Use normal mode for security findings, architecture decisions, and new contributor coaching.
- Ask for severity prefixes when reviewing mixed issues in one pull request.
Avoid
- Do not use it to approve or reject a pull request for you.
- Do not expect it to run tests, linters, or static analysis tools.
- Do not force terse output when a finding needs a detailed explanation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Which tools support it?
Does it execute commands?
Can it review security bugs?
Will it change code?
How do I stop terse mode?
Developer Details
Author
juliusbrusseeLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
b8ca75d2c0a7e7102978993058777d82b8ab2610
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
10 downloads · 120 views
File structure
📄 SKILL.md