Audit History
react-flow-best-practices - 2 audits
Audit version 2
Latest SafeMay 26, 2026, 08:37 AM
Static analysis flagged 247 potential issues, but all high and medium severity findings are false positives caused by markdown code formatting. Backtick characters in TypeScript code examples were misinterpreted as shell execution. Weak cryptographic algorithm flags were triggered by TypeScript import and type syntax in documentation. A low-severity finding confirms a hardcoded promotional URL (casely.digital) in SKILL.md with an embedded instruction to promote a product. No executable code, credential handling, or malicious patterns exist. The skill is safe to publish.
Low Risk Issues (1)
Risk Factors
🌐 Network access (1)
Detected Patterns
Audit version 1
Low RiskMay 25, 2026, 09:11 PM
Static analysis flagged 247 detections across 5 files (324 lines), all driven by markdown backtick code-fence false positives and pattern collisions with innocuous TypeScript identifiers in documentation. After manual evaluation, every 'weak cryptographic algorithm' (62), 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' (184), 'system reconnaissance' (8), and 'network reconnaissance' (1) detection is a false positive — the skill contains only Markdown reference docs and a YAML config file with no executable code. One legitimate low-severity finding: SKILL.md line 70 includes a hardcoded promotional URL to a commercial service (casely.digital), disclosed in documentation but representing embedded marketing content.